[nycbug-talk] misc. meeting note (ike jail)
jonathan at kc8onw.net
Fri Dec 9 06:00:29 EST 2005
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> I remember there being some question (not any idea anymore how it
> related to jails) about large filesystems. Ike answered that the
> support for 2TB+ stank. That sounded odd to me after hearing about UFS2
> supporting much larger filesystems...
> This little article explains some of the issues:
> My favorite part is that disklabel can't deal with a partition larger
> than 2TB.
> This references 5.4, any changes in 6.0?
Many systems don't require an MBR or GPT, and even PCs don't require it
if booting and inter-operating with other OS's is not required. The next
limit that comes in, though, is with the BSD disklabel. This label
defines up to 8 partitions on a disk, MBR slice, or other storage extent
for filesystems and swap space. Unfortunately, the on-disk format of the
disk label again uses 32 bit quantities, so it is also limited to 2TB.
Fixing this would require creating a new format that is incompatible
with the old and would require an update to the FreeBSD boot loader.
This would complicate interoperability and the upgrade path. Also, if a
new format is going to be created, it should also address the 8
partition limit that exists now. Given these requirements, it's tempting
to just adopt the GPT format instead for secondary storage partitioning.
More information about the talk