[nycbug-talk] thoughts on stability
lists at natserv.com
Wed Jun 1 21:28:22 EDT 2005
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Steve Rieger wrote:
> from what i see 4.11 is a bit more stable,
And you based that comment on?
First hand experience?
> but 5.4 has some better smp stuff
> built in to the kernel.
Although you can continue to use 4.X for as long as you want, the sooner
you move to 5.X probably the better you will be long term. I skipped 5.X
till 5.3 and have had very few problems, but my environment at all the
machines I run is fairly simple and with not much of a load.
More information about the talk