[nycbug-talk] [Re: greylisting proxies?]
okan at demirmen.com
Sun Oct 1 15:13:06 EDT 2006
On Sun 2006.10.01 at 15:08 -0400, Jonathan wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:38 PM, QuiGon wrote:
> > I switched to Spamassassin and Clamassassin (as procmail filters)
> > haven't looked back. One of the machines I run it on (the one I'm
> > sending this mail through) is an AMD K6-2 500/512MB that also runs
> > LAMP
> > with no issues (no booing here, but it's Slackware, because I've
> > yet to
> > be able to get *BSD running on a Cobalt RaQ series machine).
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > you can run spamd(8) in front of any mta; either on the same box or in
> > front.
> spamd and clamd are both memory and cpu intensive.
no. i am not talking about spamassassin's spamd. i am talking about
openbsd's spamd(8) integration with pf(4).
More information about the talk