[nycbug-talk] a new direction for NYC*BUG

[Bill Totman]

I think you're right, Chris: which repo could/would/should depend on the
project.

-bt

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Chris Snyder <chsnyder at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Chris Snyder <chsnyder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The trick with a community repository is that you're really talking
> > about creating a bunch of independent repositories, rather than one
> > big one. Hans doesn't want me committing my sloppy code into his
> > project, I'm sure.
> >
> > So whatever you choose, make sure the administrative overhead of
> > creating new repositories and assigning commit rights is handled in an
> > elegant way. And if you need to invent that wheel, that's a great seed
> > project for the new repo. Nothing like eating your own dogfood...
> >
>
> Oh, and that said, you could offer a choice. Hans prefers svn, I
> prefer hg, but they are separate repos so it doesn't matter.
>
> You would need a meta-list of projects somewhere, but I think you'll
> need that anyway?
>
> Stop me if I've had too much caffeine.
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at lists.nycbug.org
> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100325/a417b57e/attachment.html>