[CDBUG-talk] NAS hardware - MaxAttach 3000
m.hutchinson at mindspring.com
Sun Feb 10 22:17:25 EST 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdbug-talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org
> [mailto:cdbug-talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org] On Behalf Of Jaime
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 7:51 PM
> To: CDBUG
> Subject: Re: [CDBUG-talk] NAS hardware - MaxAttach 3000
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Mark Hutchinson wrote:
> > uname -mrs shows: FreeBSD 2.05.3075.17 i386
> Try uname -a. However, if it is really running FreeBSD
> 2.0.x, that is freaking old. I started with 2.2.x in 1997.
> Its up to 6 for the stable branch and 7 for the
> soon-to-be-stable branch.
granite# uname -a
FreeBSD granite. 2.05.3075.17 FreeBSD 2.05.3075.17 #2: Thu Nov 1 15:23:58
PST 2001 root at host26.nsgdev.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GRANITE.DEBUG i386
> > 1) One of the web interface management pages requires an
> old version
> > of Java (1.42 or older) and will not run on IE7. I'm using an old
> > Win2000 box with IE6 and MS-Java to change drive shares and
> > security...
> Oh that one is easy. Don't use Windows. :)
It's actually easier for me, I RDP to that box and away I go. From what I
read, it's not a Windows issue, but the specific Java that was used.
> > What's the possibility to load something more modern on
> this, rather
> > than patching an older OS?
> Updating FreeBSD is actually pretty easy over minor
> versions and even over a single major version. I imagine
> that going from 2.0 to even 5.0 would be filled with risks, though.
Would it be worth it (read: fairly easy i.e. inplace upgrade) to bring it up
> > Here's some hw info from the box (it does support telnet - w00t!)
> Probably SSH, too. Check in /etc or ps auxww| grep ssh
> for some mention of it.
I already tried, nope, no SSH :( I don't think they had those letters in the
alphabet back then.
> > # dmesg | grep CPU
> > CPU: Pentium/P55C (quarter-micron) (267.27-MHz 586-class
> CPU) # dmesg
> > | grep memory real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) avail memory =
> > 29859840 (29160K bytes)
> Dude.... 32MB and you're asking about putting
> something "more modern" on it? Nice try. I think that
> you're going to have to stick
> with one of those "bare metal" style OSes, like FreeBSD or
Correct, and by more modern, I was referring to the version of FreeBSD.
Rather than trying to figure out what the original dev team did to support
this HW and patching the flaws, I was figuring that it may be faster to
start with a more up-to-date version of the OS. Unless somebody has a 128
Meg SODIMM (PC100 probably) collecting dust, I guess I'd be stuck at 32
> Fortunately, even the current stable release of FreeBSD can
> handle that little RAM. It won't win any races, but it will work.
I dare say if it could be done, it would work better than it does now.
I think the OS and swap partitions are 32 Megs and 10 Megs, I'm figuring
that would have to change. /bin has about 24 files in it, and /etc has about
60, so it's stripped down pretty far. What would a stripped down version of
> Whatever you try to do with it, good luck.
More information about the CDBUG-talk