[nycbug-talk] thoughts on stability

[Michael Shalayeff]

Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from pete wright:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 6/1/05, Michael Shalayeff <mickey at lucifier.net> wrote:
> > Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Steve Rieger:
> > > hi all
> > >
> > >
> > > am running fbsd 4.11 and 5.4 for apache
> > >
> > > from what i see 4.11 is a bit more stable, but 5.4 has some better smp
> > > stuff built in to the kernel. i didnt run across many issues on 5.4
> > > that would prevent me from going production, and am therefore asking if
> > > anybody on this list has any valid reasons to stick to 4.11. from what
> > > i hear 6.x will be even betterm but i cant wait until then, actually i
> > > would rather not wait.
> > 
> > of course 6.x is the way to go!
> > it's the latest new thing!
> > 
> 
> heh..sure.  but if one is planning and building a new production
> server/application would it not make sense to look at the release
> schedule and plan your work accordingly?

1 2 3 check
SARCASM

tough crowd... (;

cu

-- 
    paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)