Thu Jun 3 11:50:41 EDT 2004
On Jun 3, 2004, at 10:11 AM, mlists at bizintegrators.com wrote:
>>> I'm very gratefull for OpenBSD's integrity, meaning things like
>>> only drivers will never be accepted.
>> I don't see how this is true.
>> Sure binary only modules may not be possible, but binary only patches
>> very much possible. Additionally thanks to the liberal BSD license,
>> becomes more so possible as opposed to the requirements of the GPL.
> I think binary patches and binary kernel modules are very different.
> Unless there is a source, or it complies with OpenBSD goals, they will
> not accept anything kernel or userland related. Even with source, and a
> bad license, they will not accept it. This is what I meant when I said
> the above.
> Binary patches patch already what is in the system. My comment only
> related to things like binary-only NV drivers, for example.
I don't get what you're trying to say here. Linux won't accept kernel
modules and patches that aren't GPL either, but it just so happens that
there are third parties that provide a few binary only drivers. In the
case of OpenBSD, you just don't have any interested third parties (that
I'm aware of).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2357 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20040603/730202a4/attachment.bin
More information about the talk