[nycbug-talk] review of "state of demon address"
Wed Oct 20 02:37:51 EDT 2004
On Oct 19, 2004, at 7:35 PM, G. Rosamond wrote:
> if i get some positive comments here, i will submit to the nycbug
> site. There's nothing wrong with us putting up pieces like this in
> our library section, IMHO.
> yes, i write compulsively and i did not even reread this.
> * * * *
Yo- I'd ask that you not post this (well written) rebuttal to the site,
UNTIL, you read the response Dru gave me last month here:
While I agree with 99% of what you wrote, (sup' with whimping out on
the Darwin section Gman?, [it's equally, insultingly, lame with
disinformation]), I think your time could be better spent directly
writing about *BSD stuff, SOLID, INFORMED, and TRUSTED information.
Where's the pages we can point to which explain the culture,
development cycles, and strengths of the various *BSD's? (And explain
why they're not 'distros'.)
Then, next slashdotting of crud like this, we just ALL post responses
with nothing more than NYC*BUG urls to solid information...
More information about the talk