[nycbug-talk] Re: osviews article. . .
Wed Oct 20 23:07:32 EDT 2004
On Oct 20, 2004, at 22:54, a nice bug wrote:
> Dan Langille:
>> "This article has been removed because many points made within it have
>> been deemed unfactual."
>> Good on them.
> Hilariously, it doesn't help their case that, even when crafting a
> retraction, some part of it comes out utterly wrong - "unfactual"
> isn't a word in the English language. A moment of free levity and
> now back to the real world.
I came across one of those last night in the man page for darwin's
I kinda like it.
More information about the talk