[nycbug-talk] another. . .?

[George R.]

http://www.pcbsd.org/

I find this all a bit confusing. . .

What makes an installer 'hard'?  It doesn't look like Windows?  It 
seems *that* is the standard by which all installers are judged.

I wouldn't doubt the intentions of the creators of PC-BSD, but are we 
really out to conquer the desktops of those who threw out their 
typewriters last year?  With no sarcasm, I think that OS X has 
reasonably done that, in that it's probably the most intuitive desktop 
system around.

And if the BSDs are too difficult for certain sysadmins, they should 
probably find another line of work, preferably something without any 
remotely technical content.

g