[nycbug-talk] thoughts on stability

[pete wright]

On 6/1/05, Michael Shalayeff <mickey at lucifier.net> wrote:
> Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from pete wright:
> [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > On 6/1/05, Michael Shalayeff <mickey at lucifier.net> wrote:
> > > Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Steve Rieger:
> > > > hi all
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > am running fbsd 4.11 and 5.4 for apache
> > > >
> > > > from what i see 4.11 is a bit more stable, but 5.4 has some better smp
> > > > stuff built in to the kernel. i didnt run across many issues on 5.4
> > > > that would prevent me from going production, and am therefore asking if
> > > > anybody on this list has any valid reasons to stick to 4.11. from what
> > > > i hear 6.x will be even betterm but i cant wait until then, actually i
> > > > would rather not wait.
> > >
> > > of course 6.x is the way to go!
> > > it's the latest new thing!
> > >
> >
> > heh..sure.  but if one is planning and building a new production
> > server/application would it not make sense to look at the release
> > schedule and plan your work accordingly?
> 
> 1 2 3 check

(crickets ;p)

> SARCASM
> 
> tough crowd... (;
> 

yea, too much coffee...my fault.


-p



-- 
~~o0OO0o~~
Pete Wright
www.nycbug.org
NYC's *BSD User Group