[nycbug-talk] IPv6 Followup

[Alex Pilosov]

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Okan Demirmen wrote:

> On Fri 2007.11.09 at 12:13 -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jim Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > As it happens, I now have an assignment to write a position paper on
> > > IPv6 for a client.  Unfortunately, I was not able to attend the last two
> > > BUGs.
> > See and listen to this and make your own conclusions
> > http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/bush.html
> > http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/real/nanog41-transition.ram
> > 
> > > If anyone wants to offer their expert opinion on all things IPv6, I'm
> > > interested.
> > ipv6 will happen. it has to. you should get yourself *ready* to run it - 
> > there's no harm in it. generally, it no longer requires equipment 
> > investment, just configuration. operationally, however, nobody cares. 
>                                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 							  what?
> 
> that is a very broad, over-reaching statement, and i for one will
> disagree.  operationally, people care.  now *who* those people are is
> another question; they may not be all the people that need to care, but
> there are people who care operationally.  with statements like the
> above, the "other people" will never think they need to care - so it
> goes as it is going now.
ok,

simple, show me who cares. operationally. someone who both *cares* and 
*matters*. no, home ipv6 tunnels through sixxs and occaid don't count.

-alex