From lists at stringsutils.com Mon Dec 1 13:32:05 2008 From: lists at stringsutils.com (Francisco Reyes) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:32:05 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Matt Juszczak writes: > But I do like how with Ubuntu, you can just plug in a flash drive, etc., > and it just works. I use OpenSuse as desktop, primarily because VMware does not work with FreeBSD. I have not tried qemu though, which is supposed to work in FreeBSD. Virtualization is likely one reason why some people may end up using something other than FreeBSD for desktop. Even though virtualization seems like a very requested feature in FreeBSD, doesn't seem like there are resources to work on it. Someone from virtualbox was even looking for someone to do paid work to get virtualbox to work in FreeBSD and he was no able to find someone. From scottro at nyc.rr.com Mon Dec 1 13:46:59 2008 From: scottro at nyc.rr.com (Scott Robbins) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:46:59 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081201184659.GA47626@mail.scottro.net> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:32:05PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > > Virtualization is likely one reason why some people may end up using > something other than FreeBSD for desktop. > > Even though virtualization seems like a very requested feature in FreeBSD, > doesn't seem like there are resources to work on it. Someone from virtualbox > was even looking for someone to do paid work to get virtualbox to work in > FreeBSD and he was no able to find someone. Orlando, the fellow who did the port for VMware-workstation 3 has taken the bounty offered by rsync for VMWare-workstation. I haven't heard further. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: I don't get your crazy system! Giles: It's called the alphabet. Xander: Would ya look at that. From akosela at andykosela.com Tue Dec 2 03:38:45 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:38:45 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812020038qf769f55v73c867da73451c4f@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > I have not tried qemu though, which is supposed to work in FreeBSD. qemu works with no problems, but for some reason I prefer virtualbox. I wonder when this gonna be available for FreeBSD. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From trish at bsdunix.net Tue Dec 2 12:08:11 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:08:11 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I use Mac OS X, primarily, of course i use FreeBSD primarily for server work, but OS X gives me the best of 3 different worlds: 1) a user friendly, crisp, and intuitive graphical environment 2) a wide range of useful software - including virtualization - to run my BootCamp partition off VMWare Fusion or Parallels Desktop when I need to (Parallels is better for windows gaming, VMWare Fusion seems to be faster in general though) 3) a whole UNIX-like (mostly FreeBSD userland) system underneath, so that I can do all the stuff I would do on a UNIX-like desktop machine. I understand not everyone can afford a Mac, but there is also OSX86 (http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page ), which I have running on several PeeCees built specifically for it. I built the PeeCees for under 500 each, and if you run a machine that has a processor with VT extentions, then you really have no difference, given the BIOS translation mechanism :) ciao. -Trish On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Matt Juszczak writes: > >> But I do like how with Ubuntu, you can just plug in a flash drive, >> etc., >> and it just works. > > I use OpenSuse as desktop, primarily because VMware does not work with > FreeBSD. I have not tried qemu though, which is supposed to work in > FreeBSD. > > Virtualization is likely one reason why some people may end up using > something other than FreeBSD for desktop. > > Even though virtualization seems like a very requested feature in > FreeBSD, > doesn't seem like there are resources to work on it. Someone from > virtualbox > was even looking for someone to do paid work to get virtualbox to > work in > FreeBSD and he was no able to find someone. > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk From spork at bway.net Tue Dec 2 15:32:00 2008 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:32:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: > I understand not everyone can afford a Mac, but there is also OSX86 (http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > ), which I have running on several PeeCees built specifically for it. > I built the PeeCees for under 500 each, and if you run a machine that > has a processor with VT extentions, then you really have no > difference, given the BIOS translation mechanism :) I've been meaning to try this - I've got a few "real" Macs. What I'd really like to see is a list of small/cheap notebooks that are very compatible with osx86... Something like the old 12" PB. Charles > ciao. > > -Trish > > > > On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > >> Matt Juszczak writes: >> >>> But I do like how with Ubuntu, you can just plug in a flash drive, >>> etc., >>> and it just works. >> >> I use OpenSuse as desktop, primarily because VMware does not work with >> FreeBSD. I have not tried qemu though, which is supposed to work in >> FreeBSD. >> >> Virtualization is likely one reason why some people may end up using >> something other than FreeBSD for desktop. >> >> Even though virtualization seems like a very requested feature in >> FreeBSD, >> doesn't seem like there are resources to work on it. Someone from >> virtualbox >> was even looking for someone to do paid work to get virtualbox to >> work in >> FreeBSD and he was no able to find someone. >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk at lists.nycbug.org >> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > From bcully at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 15:38:28 2008 From: bcully at gmail.com (Brian Cully) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:38:28 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <014A3EEE-CD3F-4496-AF50-02CD42F498A4@gmail.com> On 2-Dec-2008, at 15:32, Charles Sprickman wrote: > I've been meaning to try this - I've got a few "real" Macs. What I'd > really like to see is a list of small/cheap notebooks that are very > compatible with osx86... Something like the old 12" PB. A friend of mine just set it up on an MSI Wind Notebook: http://nerdifer.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-i-setup-dual-boot-hackintosh-osx86.html -bjc From carton at Ivy.NET Wed Dec 3 00:04:36 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:04:36 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [Miles Nordin] IPv6 problems with your DNS servers Message-ID: :( -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Miles Nordin Subject: IPv6 problems with your DNS servers Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:03:32 -0500 Size: 4900 URL: From sjt.kar at gmail.com Wed Dec 3 00:32:07 2008 From: sjt.kar at gmail.com (Sujit Karataparambil) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:02:07 +0530 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [Miles Nordin] IPv6 problems with your DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <921ca19c0812022132j32c8c7f2h13f022711b047628@mail.gmail.com> Looks like you will have to dig into bind manual. This is an extract of how the IPV6 Routing is being Carried Out. http://www.isi.edu/~bmanning/v6DNS.html Looks like it is an problem with the IPV6 and IPV4 being simulatneously Being used. This will require an quad-A DNS Lookup.Supported only on few softwares. Thanks, Sujit On 12/3/08, Miles Nordin wrote: > :( > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Miles Nordin > To: domain at facebook.com > Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:03:32 -0500 > Subject: IPv6 problems with your DNS servers > Your nameservers are broken w.r.t. IPv6 queries, which are sent by > default on modern operating systems like Mac OS X, if you have an > IPv6-speaking nameserver, which I do. Have a look at the typescript > below. Your server is timing out on the initial AAAA query. Since > you haven't implemented IPv6, you should answer the AAAA query > immediately with 0 answers so that my resolver can immediately retry > an A query---see the normal example for laconi.ca, or just open a Mac > OS X terminal and try 'dig aaaa' for any domain except your > own. > > The consequence: sites that have turned up IPv6 find that Facebook > works extremely slowly. It's available, at best, 30 seconds out of > every 45. In general it's much worse because after you've been idle > for more than 30 seconds, the site freezes for 15 seconds. > > This is not merely an issue of improving things for the small fraction > of your users that have IPv6. It's about being a good neighbor on the > Internet, because v6-broken sites are a significant impediment to IPv6 > adoption. They make IPv6 harder to roll out because of the painful > brokenness and slowness, and also encourage a lot of broken > workarounds inside operating systems and browsers that fix your broken > site while breaking other sites that have implemented IPv6 properly. > We've already had problems with one such workaround being slipped into > Firefox, but AFAICT it was backed out. > > TIA for your attention, and best wishes. > > -----8<----- > castrovalva:~$ time dig www.facebook.com aaaa @69.63.176.101 > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> www.facebook.com aaaa @69.63.176.101 > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > real 0m15.053s > user 0m0.028s > sys 0m0.016s > castrovalva:~$ time dig www.facebook.com a @69.63.176.101 > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> www.facebook.com a @69.63.176.101 > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36146 > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;www.facebook.com. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > www.facebook.com. 30 IN A 69.63.176.143 > > ;; Query time: 140 msec > ;; SERVER: 69.63.176.101#53(69.63.176.101) > ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 2 23:44:28 2008 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 50 > > > real 0m0.184s > user 0m0.031s > sys 0m0.014s > castrovalva:~$ > -----8<----- > > -----8<----- > castrovalva:~$ dig laconi.ca AAAA @209.172.55.139 > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> laconi.ca AAAA @209.172.55.139 > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 18146 > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;laconi.ca. IN AAAA > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > laconi.ca. 1800 IN SOA ns1.laconi.ca. hostmaster.laconi.ca. 2008100601 28800 7200 2419200 1800 > > ;; Query time: 53 msec > ;; SERVER: 209.172.55.139#53(209.172.55.139) > ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 2 23:57:51 2008 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 78 > > castrovalva:~$ dig laconi.ca A @209.172.55.139 > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> laconi.ca A @209.172.55.139 > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23607 > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;laconi.ca. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > laconi.ca. 1800 IN A 75.101.228.101 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > laconi.ca. 1800 IN NS ns1.twisted4life.com. > laconi.ca. 1800 IN NS ns1.laconi.ca. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > ns1.laconi.ca. 1800 IN A 209.172.55.139 > > ;; Query time: 68 msec > ;; SERVER: 209.172.55.139#53(209.172.55.139) > ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 2 23:58:03 2008 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 111 > > -----8<----- > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > From carton at Ivy.NET Wed Dec 3 10:09:45 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:09:45 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [Miles Nordin] IPv6 problems with your DNS servers In-Reply-To: <921ca19c0812022132j32c8c7f2h13f022711b047628@mail.gmail.com> (Sujit Karataparambil's message of "Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:02:07 +0530") References: <921ca19c0812022132j32c8c7f2h13f022711b047628@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "sk" == Sujit Karataparambil writes: sk> This is an extract of how the IPV6 Routing is being Carried sk> Out. http://www.isi.edu/~bmanning/v6DNS.html 1. DNS != routing 2. Those instructions are out-of-date and wrong. For one thing, ip6.int is not used any more. It's ip6.arpa. There may be other problems. Instead, use the regular BIND documentation, which is the BIND Administrator's Reference Manual which is a bunch of .html files installed along with BIND. On my system it's in /usr/share/doc/html/bind/Bv9ARM.html. 3. try 'dig web.ivy.net aaaa'. I have IPv6 DNS working just fine to serve my zones, including asking and answering queries over v6. 08:37:03.450455 IP6 2610:1f8:dc:c0::1.65139 > 2001:4200:1010::1.53: 60817 [1au] A? ru.ac.za. (37) 08:37:03.567448 IP6 2610:1f8:dc:c0::1.65139 > 2001:7b8:3:1f:0:2:53:2.53: 48637 [1au][|domain] 08:37:03.678671 IP6 2001:7b8:3:1f:0:2:53:2.53 > 2610:1f8:dc:c0::1.65139: 48637 NXDomain*-[|domain] 08:37:03.778992 IP6 2001:4200:1010::1.53 > 2610:1f8:dc:c0::1.65139: 60817*- 1/5/11 (389) This is done already, works, and is not the problem. sk> Looks like it is an problem with the IPV6 and IPV4 being sk> simulatneously Being used. Why is this a problem? How else would IPv6 be used? sk> This will require an quad-A DNS Lookup.Supported only on few sk> softwares. yeah, a few softwares like BIND, BSD, Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows, all for ~1 decade, and except Windows all by default. Anyway the problem is described in my email: $ dig www.facebook.com aaaa <-- hangs for 15 seconds $ dig anythingelse.com aaaa <-- returns quickly, even for sites running crappy djbware without IPv6 support If I use tcpdump I can see that facebook's crappy load balancers are simply dropping the AAAA queries with no response, which is why lookup hangs. And the idiots have set a 30sec ttl, so it hangs every 30 seconds. 08:14:05.109594 IP 10.100.100.129.65140 > 69.63.176.101.53: 60836 AAAA? www.facebook.com. (34) 08:14:07.111153 IP 10.100.100.129.65140 > 69.63.191.219.53: 15140 AAAA? www.facebook.com. (34) 08:14:11.118032 IP 10.100.100.129.65140 > 69.63.176.101.53: 40338 [1au] AAAA? www.facebook.com. (45) 08:14:13.119844 IP 10.100.100.129.65140 > 69.63.191.219.53: 20169 [1au] AAAA? www.facebook.com. (45) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trish at bsdunix.net Wed Dec 3 10:30:20 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:30:20 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9091328C-4716-4EAF-839C-F739AA34B057@bsdunix.net> On Dec 2, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: >> > > I've been meaning to try this - I've got a few "real" Macs. What > I'd really like to see is a list of small/cheap notebooks that are > very compatible with osx86... Something like the old 12" PB. > > Charles I have it running on an old Hpaq nx7000 type notebook, and everything works for the most part, except it doesn't run any of the virtualization software other than qemu out there, because the Proc does not support VT. Other than that, its what I used as a main laptop until I got my MacBook Pro at work. -Trish From lists at stringsutils.com Wed Dec 3 11:05:30 2008 From: lists at stringsutils.com (Francisco Reyes) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:05:30 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812020038qf769f55v73c867da73451c4f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Andy Kosela writes: > ... I prefer virtualbox. > I wonder when this gonna be available for FreeBSD. Probably not any time soon. The Virtualbox team were looking for developers to pay them to get virtualbox to work under FreeBSD and they were unable to find anyone. From robin.polak at gmail.com Wed Dec 3 11:22:03 2008 From: robin.polak at gmail.com (Robin Polak) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:22:03 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812020038qf769f55v73c867da73451c4f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <551868240812030822y46083e33ibb4fc5cb128abf6a@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:05, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Andy Kosela writes: > > > ... I prefer virtualbox. > > I wonder when this gonna be available for FreeBSD. > > Probably not any time soon. > The Virtualbox team were looking for developers to pay them to get > virtualbox to work under FreeBSD and they were unable to find anyone. > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > That's really too bad. I really like the flexibility and performance I get out of VirtualBox. -- Robin Polak E-Mail: robin.polak at gmail.com V. 917-494-2080 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carton at Ivy.NET Wed Dec 3 13:04:46 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:04:46 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: <9091328C-4716-4EAF-839C-F739AA34B057@bsdunix.net> (Siobhan P. Lynch's message of "Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:30:20 -0500") References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com> <9091328C-4716-4EAF-839C-F739AA34B057@bsdunix.net> <3cc535c80812020038qf769f55v73c867da73451c4f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: >>>>> "fr" == Francisco Reyes writes: fr> looking for developers to pay them to get virtualbox to work fr> under FreeBSD and they were unable to find anyone. spl> doesn't run any of the virtualization software other than qemu spl> out there, because the Proc does not support VT. VirtualBox works without VT and runs on Mac OS X. also, ``BSD is dying.'' :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From matt at atopia.net Wed Dec 3 13:23:42 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (matt at atopia.net) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:23:42 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Desktop In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80811211250p1e89e8e9w84bd0890f47f6719@mail.gmail.com><9091328C-4716-4EAF-839C-F739AA34B057@bsdunix.net><3cc535c80812020038qf769f55v73c867da73451c4f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1676861250-1228328620-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-176227263-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> BSD is dying? -----Original Message----- From: Miles Nordin Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:04:46 To: Subject: Re: [nycbug-talk] Desktop _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk at lists.nycbug.org http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk From ike at lesmuug.org Thu Dec 4 08:11:33 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:11:33 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] BSD license compatable, Python 3.0 Released Message-ID: <0E75DEC1-7A9D-49B8-89DC-6EFCC57A84FF@lesmuug.org> Hi All, For those who dig Python (and any high-level languages), the long- awaited 'Python 3000' release is out- the first totally clean break in the language in years, totally backwards-incompatible with earlier Python- (a lot has been cleaned up). A notable license based cleanup: "This Python distribution contains *no* GNU General Public License (GPL) code, so it may be used in proprietary projects. There are interfaces to some GNU code but these are entirely optional." -- Additionally, the bulk of the changes seriously simplify using the high-level language for day-to-day tasks; for example with integers, int and long are now just one thing- int. Also, the core libraries have been cleaned up and boiled down! This is exciting both from a simpler-to-use perspective, as well as reducing the securable surface area of the language as a whole. http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.0/ http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html Happy hacking! Rocket- .ike From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Thu Dec 4 09:36:02 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:36:02 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks Message-ID: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. Right now it only has 4 videos from MeetBSD, but this might be something to keep an eye. http://www.youtube.com/bsdconferences Enjoy Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From akosela at andykosela.com Thu Dec 4 09:53:03 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:53:03 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812040653s1c94d140g96cb3b4244b52692@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on YouTube > with videos of BSD technical talks. > > Right now it only has 4 videos from MeetBSD, but this might be > something to keep an eye. > > http://www.youtube.com/bsdconferences Yeah, all those who track Planet FreeBSD should also notice it. There are some really nice videos on YouTube for Unix enthusiasts. I can also recommend http://youtube.com/watch?v=7FjX7r5icV8 and http://youtube.com/watch?v=nNkqKdLm1rU -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From carton at Ivy.NET Thu Dec 4 10:45:53 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:45:53 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> (Steven Kreuzer's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:36:02 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can watch without using COMPAT_LINUX? From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Thu Dec 4 11:09:40 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:09:40 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: > > sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on > sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. > > Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can > watch without using COMPAT_LINUX Then run Firefox under wine. If it makes you feel any better, 2009 is the year of BSD on the desktop, so you only have to deal with COMPAT_LINUX for another 4 weeks. Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From nycbug at cyth.net Thu Dec 4 11:32:32 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:32:32 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <7765c0380812040832x7034c59gb35760b0c9384be2@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: >> >> sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on >> sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. >> >> Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can >> watch without using COMPAT_LINUX > > Then run Firefox under wine. > > If it makes you feel any better, 2009 is the year of BSD on the desktop, > so you only have to deal with COMPAT_LINUX for another 4 weeks. My Chinese conglomerates confirm that BSD on the desktop has indeed replaced the Ox for 2009. -Ray- > > Steven Kreuzer > http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > From ike at lesmuug.org Thu Dec 4 13:09:44 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:09:44 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <3FAA07AC-008C-4ABD-BEC4-0A2A5BF37E6F@lesmuug.org> Hey All, On Dec 4, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: >> >> sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on >> sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. >> >> Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can >> watch without using COMPAT_LINUX > > Then run Firefox under wine. Wow you both have excellent points. While I agree that the video content should be open and free from any particular 3rd party copyright or access control, YouTube is currently the cheapest and easiest video distribution system to date... And grandma can use it... However, in lieu of what we as BSD Advocates should do when posting videos, Lawrence Lessig recently posted some guidelines aimed at the Obama administration, which I feel could be applied more generally to us: http://open-government.us/ If things like Video posting gets too legalistic, the BSD License will get as long and contentious as the GPL- but at the very least, this is very good food for thought... -- And BTW- If anyone wants to download an mp4 format of YouTube stuff, give http://keepvid.com/ a whirl... Rocket- .ike From okan at demirmen.com Thu Dec 4 14:23:50 2008 From: okan at demirmen.com (Okan Demirmen) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:23:50 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <3FAA07AC-008C-4ABD-BEC4-0A2A5BF37E6F@lesmuug.org> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <57735E9E-34DC-494E-9EFF-B4152655F009@exit2shell.com> <3FAA07AC-008C-4ABD-BEC4-0A2A5BF37E6F@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20081204192350.GA6896@clam.khaoz.org> On Thu 2008.12.04 at 13:09 -0500, Isaac Levy wrote: > Hey All, > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: > > > >>>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: > >> > >> sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on > >> sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. > >> > >> Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can > >> watch without using COMPAT_LINUX > > > > Then run Firefox under wine. > > Wow you both have excellent points. > > While I agree that the video content should be open and free from any > particular 3rd party copyright or access control, YouTube is currently > the cheapest and easiest video distribution system to date... And > grandma can use it... > > However, in lieu of what we as BSD Advocates should do when posting > videos, Lawrence Lessig recently posted some guidelines aimed at the > Obama administration, which I feel could be applied more generally to > us: > http://open-government.us/ > If things like Video posting gets too legalistic, the BSD License will > get as long and contentious as the GPL- but at the very least, this is > very good food for thought... > > -- > And BTW- If anyone wants to download an mp4 format of YouTube stuff, > give http://keepvid.com/ a whirl... you of all people should know youtube-dl From akosela at andykosela.com Thu Dec 4 15:19:31 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 21:19:31 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812041219t53da30e8m1ad94bbfbb5c6543@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: > > sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on > sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. > > Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can > watch without using COMPAT_LINUX? It would definetly make more sense to have a *NATIVE* Flash plugin, but it seems it ain't happening anytime soon. At least YouTube is still compatible with Flash 7.x so I can watch it without wine by using nspluginwrapper. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Thu Dec 4 15:49:13 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:49:13 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812041219t53da30e8m1ad94bbfbb5c6543@mail.gmail.com> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <3cc535c80812041219t53da30e8m1ad94bbfbb5c6543@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5D52A995-7CE7-4B92-A6BB-EDA19192B61C@exit2shell.com> On Dec 4, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Andy Kosela wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: >> >> sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on >> sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. >> >> Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can >> watch without using COMPAT_LINUX? > > It would definetly make more sense to have a *NATIVE* Flash plugin, > but it seems it ain't happening anytime soon. At least YouTube is > still compatible with Flash 7.x so I can watch it without wine by > using nspluginwrapper. At NYCBSDCon I was speaking with the CEO of iX Systems and he mentioned that they have been working with Adobe and have a team dedicated to developing a native port of Flash 9 for FreeBSD and PC BSD Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From carton at Ivy.NET Thu Dec 4 16:16:58 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:16:58 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> (Ray Lai's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:58:37 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "rl" == Ray Lai writes: rl> Are you providing the bandwidth? were you not following the discussion? I'm not providing the videos, the bandwidth, nor the content. I thought that was pretty obvious, but in case you missed it, I'm not. I'm complaining that I have to hear about it when I can't easily watch it. Obviously there are plenty of reasons to use Youtube which makes it popular. Aside from ad-supported bandwidth, a lot of people use it because they already know how and are too lazy to learn more free but different and possibly more awkward tools, or they have some proprietary gizmo with a built-in Youtube! uploader so stupid-simple their kid sister can use it, and they don't want to deal with any of this techno mumbo jumbo, they want to go shopping for chocolate and shoes instead. good reasons. I never meant to say Youtube! is dumb and anyone who uses it is dumb. I said, wouldn't it make sense to find another way to distribute videos if your intent is to advocate BSD? I think a software community is one level of dead when they don't have enough working tools to support themselves and have to borrow from some other ``enemy'' camp to survive, like downloading the source for cl-httpd from an Apache-run site, or developing FreeBSD inside VirtualBox on Mac OS X because FreeBSD can't host any reasonable virtualization (not even Xen, though NetBSD can do Xen dom0/domU). It's a whole 'nother level of dead when they HAVE tools available to support themselves, but choose not to use them. rl> Anyway there are YouTube rippers out there, gnash, and rl> probably other stuff I don't know about. right, Ray. That's what you do, is it? use gnash? which one do you use, the one in pkgsrc or freebsd ports or openbsd ports, eh? I'm surprised the evil GNU license doesn't scare you away by trying to deprive programmers of a living or some such bullshit. get real. You open it on a Mac, or probably on Windows. and it's native Mac/Windows, not running inside a VM on a BSD host, isn't it? That's what almost all of you sorry lot of motherfucking apologists do. You tell me what my kind of marginal whiner ought to do if he cares so damn much, and brush under the rug what you do yourselves. I'm among the biggest BSD advocates here just because I watch Youtube under Opera with COMPAT_LINUX, and that's PATHETIC. Ubuntu people are really good about distributing their videos in open formats that play with the native software included in their distribution. And I guarantee you anyone who asks for a more free format will get a shamed apology, not a bunch of rants about how practical and profitable and successful the proprietary system is. CCC always gives me videos of the congress and the camp in a format I can play natively on BSD, even though the Krauts use almost exclusively Linux, rarely BSD. It's only from other supposed BSD people I'm getting the crappy proprietary formats. How can I complain to Linux-centric developers that they keep breaking the ffmpeg builds on BSD with their Linuxisms, when there's such shitty advocacy from within the BSD camp? On BSD where getting FLASH to work is much harder than Ubuntu, _I'm_ the troll for asking for an open format, and I'm supposed to accomodate the platform-insensitive choices of these supposed advocates? Yes, I am. That is, as you've all just collectively defined it, the BSD culture. And that's why your OS is so fucking dead! It's your own damn fault. What a disappointment. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nycbug at cyth.net Thu Dec 4 17:18:15 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:18:15 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7765c0380812041418v447235d8id0f87f483df6528@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "rl" == Ray Lai writes: > > rl> Are you providing the bandwidth? > > were you not following the discussion? I'm not providing the videos, > the bandwidth, nor the content. I thought that was pretty obvious, > but in case you missed it, I'm not. I'm complaining that I have to > hear about it when I can't easily watch it. My point was that it is the easiest way to publish videos online. I personally do not have my own bandwidth to share videos with, so YouTube would be the best way for me to upload videos. > Obviously there are plenty of reasons to use Youtube which makes it > popular. Aside from ad-supported bandwidth, a lot of people use it > because they already know how and are too lazy to learn more free but > different and possibly more awkward tools, or they have some > proprietary gizmo with a built-in Youtube! uploader so stupid-simple > their kid sister can use it, and they don't want to deal with any of > this techno mumbo jumbo, they want to go shopping for chocolate and > shoes instead. good reasons. I never meant to say Youtube! is dumb > and anyone who uses it is dumb. I said, wouldn't it make sense to > find another way to distribute videos if your intent is to advocate > BSD? Well, that's the problem. Who would provide the infrastructure? Youtube is here, available, and free. If I wanted to share a video, I can't be expected to develop a BSD plugin for Firefox first. And anyway, I already mentioned such tools that are available. > I think a software community is one level of dead when they don't have > enough working tools to support themselves and have to borrow from > some other ``enemy'' camp to survive, like downloading the source for > cl-httpd from an Apache-run site, or developing FreeBSD inside > VirtualBox on Mac OS X because FreeBSD can't host any reasonable > virtualization (not even Xen, though NetBSD can do Xen dom0/domU). > It's a whole 'nother level of dead when they HAVE tools available to > support themselves, but choose not to use them. Well, I'm not sure which level of dead I'm at... but for the record I develop OpenBSD on an OpenBSD box. And about the only tools I use are included in OpenBSD, except for the web browser. Sorry, it's a little painful to use Lynx. > rl> Anyway there are YouTube rippers out there, gnash, and > rl> probably other stuff I don't know about. > > right, Ray. That's what you do, is it? use gnash? which one do you > use, the one in pkgsrc or freebsd ports or openbsd ports, eh? I'm > surprised the evil GNU license doesn't scare you away by trying to > deprive programmers of a living or some such bullshit. I've used gnash in the past, I didn't have much luck with it, from the OpenBSD ports. I don't consider it evil, but I did use pedro@'s yt program to extract Youtube videos and watch them on mplayer. > get real. You open it on a Mac, or probably on Windows. and it's > native Mac/Windows, not running inside a VM on a BSD host, isn't it? When I am at a friend's Mac or Windows machine, yes, I would naturally click on the link that opens Youtube, rather than running quickly to my own laptop. > That's what almost all of you sorry lot of motherfucking apologists > do. You tell me what my kind of marginal whiner ought to do if he > cares so damn much, and brush under the rug what you do yourselves. > I'm among the biggest BSD advocates here just because I watch Youtube > under Opera with COMPAT_LINUX, and that's PATHETIC. What I can suggest you do if you care so much, is work on a convenient Flash player that works well in BSD. Right now I care about OpenCVS and pcc, so I'm taking the code and playing with it, getting stuff in. In the meantime I'm using GNU cvs and gcc where they fall short. > Ubuntu people are really good about distributing their videos in open > formats that play with the native software included in their > distribution. What formats do they distribute in? Though it's not video, Will Backman provides his podcasts in mp3 and ogg format for BSDTalk. OpenBSD does the same with each release song. They're a lot easier to distribute due to their size, of course, and a lot better software support for mp3s any video codecs out. > And I guarantee you anyone who asks for a more free > format will get a shamed apology, not a bunch of rants about how > practical and profitable and successful the proprietary system is. ? > CCC always gives me videos of the congress and the camp in a format I > can play natively on BSD, even though the Krauts use almost > exclusively Linux, rarely BSD. What format is that in? > It's only from other supposed BSD people I'm getting the crappy > proprietary formats. How can I complain to Linux-centric developers > that they keep breaking the ffmpeg builds on BSD with their Linuxisms, > when there's such shitty advocacy from within the BSD camp? On BSD > where getting FLASH to work is much harder than Ubuntu, _I'm_ the > troll for asking for an open format, and I'm supposed to accomodate > the platform-insensitive choices of these supposed advocates? I wasn't advocating anything, I was trying to explain the video author's position and offer solutions I've used in the past. I never called you a troll. > Yes, I am. That is, as you've all just collectively defined it, the > BSD culture. > > And that's why your OS is so fucking dead! It's your own damn fault. > What a disappointment. Don't worry, 2009 is almost here. -Ray- From akosela at andykosela.com Thu Dec 4 17:19:41 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:19:41 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <5D52A995-7CE7-4B92-A6BB-EDA19192B61C@exit2shell.com> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <3cc535c80812041219t53da30e8m1ad94bbfbb5c6543@mail.gmail.com> <5D52A995-7CE7-4B92-A6BB-EDA19192B61C@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812041419x1b10bd7l5066e8eb7b6fda86@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > At NYCBSDCon I was speaking with the CEO of iX Systems and he > mentioned that they have been working with Adobe and have a team > dedicated to developing a native port of Flash 9 for FreeBSD and PC BSD > Excellent news! That should be a priority nowadays for projects like PC-BSD which target a desktop user. I am definetly not the only one who would like to see it on FreeBSD. Like it or not flash is really the technology you need on your desktop, and I really hate to use COMPAT_LINUX or wine to use it. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From carton at Ivy.NET Thu Dec 4 19:50:15 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:50:15 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <7765c0380812041418v447235d8id0f87f483df6528@mail.gmail.com> (Ray Lai's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:18:15 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <7765c0380812041418v447235d8id0f87f483df6528@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "rl" == Ray Lai writes: rl> Who would provide the infrastructure? I just host things on my DSL, which ought to work fine for videos only announced on this list. If more than one or two people want to download at a time, you can buy cheapass shared hosting, ask one of the BSD projects to host it, ask NYC*BUG to host it. If it gets even busier you can use bittorrent. in short, everything we did before Youtube appeared. Isaac's Obama link under ``no technical barrier to sharing'' suggests blip.tv over Youtube, but this is the first I've heard of it. Hosting should be cheap enough, and easy enough for someone who says he's interested in BSD. I feel like, for someone advocating BSD, not being able to post a big file on the web is sort of like an adult eskimo not knowing how to make a fishing hook. ``We need to communicate in files that aren't easily playable on BSD because our knowledge of BSD hasn't helped us learn how to publish our own shit on the Internet?'' either way it's thoroughly pathetic. rl> I did use pedro@'s yt program to extract Youtube videos and rl> watch them on mplayer. On OpenBSD mplayer or Linux mplayer? What does mplayer use to play yt's fetched content? AIUI on Linux this uses shared libs from realplayer, so I don't know how it would work on OpenBSD. Is it some COMPAT_LINUX mplayer-linux port or something? rl> What I can suggest you do if you care so much, is work on a rl> convenient Flash player that works well in BSD. no thanks, I'm not going to play catch-up with proprietary formats. And remember, on this particular occasion I'm not complaining about Youtube videos posted by Windows users. I'm saying, ``why is a supposed BSD advocate posting videos in a format that's hard to view under BSD? when better formats have been available for longer? It's like he assumes no one actually uses the thing he's advocating, and I think he's probably about right.'' Finally, even if it weren't a depressing waste of time, I lack the skill and the drive to write a Flash replacement, while having more than enough skill and drive to encode videos in a reasonable format. Is that so surprising? Is no one else in the same situation? ``Just write a Herculean amount of code if you care so damn much'' shouldn't be a way of shutting people up. rl> What formats do Ubuntu distribute in? Theora container. not sure what's inside but Ubuntu doesn't distribute proprietary things like FLASH with their base system, so it's almost certainly BSD-friendly. rl> What format is [CCC videos] in? H.264 inside .mp4 container that was made with one of the free Linux tools and plays well under mplayer. For the few things I've encoded, I use mpeg4 made by lavc or ffmpeg, with ogg audio, inside .mkv container. This plays on OpenBSD and supports non-square pixels and mux'd text subtitles. All three play without binary blobs so they work well under BSD, and in Linux-land we've been encoding all three since before Youtube existed, except maybe the H.264 but I think even that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trish at bsdunix.net Thu Dec 4 20:31:20 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:31:20 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "rl" == Ray Lai writes: > > rl> Are you providing the bandwidth? > > > I'm among the biggest BSD advocates here just because I watch Youtube > under Opera with COMPAT_LINUX, and that's PATHETIC. > > Ubuntu people are really good about distributing their videos in open > formats that play with the native software included in their > distribution. And I guarantee you anyone who asks for a more free > format will get a shamed apology, not a bunch of rants about how > practical and profitable and successful the proprietary system is. > > CCC always gives me videos of the congress and the camp in a format I > can play natively on BSD, even though the Krauts use almost > exclusively Linux, rarely BSD. > > It's only from other supposed BSD people I'm getting the crappy > proprietary formats. How can I complain to Linux-centric developers > that they keep breaking the ffmpeg builds on BSD with their Linuxisms, > when there's such shitty advocacy from within the BSD camp? On BSD > where getting FLASH to work is much harder than Ubuntu, _I'm_ the > troll for asking for an open format, and I'm supposed to accomodate > the platform-insensitive choices of these supposed advocates? > > Yes, I am. That is, as you've all just collectively defined it, the > BSD culture. > > And that's why your OS is so fucking dead! It's your own damn fault. > What a disappointment Then go somewhere else... You know, I'm usually pretty quiet, but this vitriol really seems uncalled for... the only way it can have more venom is for you to use uncouth swear ("four letter") words. Seriously, if you really have that many complaints, then please, by all means, find a different solution. It seems like every time I turn around you have some other complaint and you're vehemently expressing it... and trust me I don;t mind the expression of opinions, but you are directing your opinion in such a way as top stir up people's feelings so they *feel* insulted, no matter what their point of view regarding the issue is. I think, unfortunately, mailing lists lend themselves to this kind of rudeness. I doubt you would be so vehemently insulting in tone if you were in a group of people in-person. But then again, I'm sorta glad I don't know you in person. I don't have a lot of time for this kind of thing. I personally could care less what format Murray posts in. I really don;t care of Murray posts in some format that can only be viewed on a BeOS box - its smimply not worth the type of rise in blood pressure that you exhibit in your posting. To the rest of the list: I'm sorry for this "off-topic" post.... I just could not let this go, after reading venom and vitriol for months from him. -Trish From nycbug at cyth.net Thu Dec 4 10:58:37 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:58:37 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "sk" == Steven Kreuzer writes: > > sk> It looks like Murray Stokely is putting together a channel on > sk> YouTube with videos of BSD technical talks. > > Wouldn't it make sense to post the videos in a format BSD users can > watch without using COMPAT_LINUX? Are you providing the bandwidth? Anyway there are YouTube rippers out there, gnash, and probably other stuff I don't know about. -Ray- From carton at Ivy.NET Fri Dec 5 13:41:44 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:41:44 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: (Siobhan P. Lynch's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:31:20 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: spl> stir up people's feelings so they *feel* spl> insulted, no matter what their point of view regarding the spl> issue is. Do you actually have a point of view, other than ``you're making me feel bad, and I don't like it when you say fuck and shit, so I wish you would leave''? I certainly never asked anyone to leave because of his opinions, but you have. I think BSD is in a worse spot than five years ago, and the problem is largely cultural, and the discussion's therefore relevant. If we don't even have a safe place to talk honestly, then this really is a disaster. spl> I doubt you would be so vehemently insulting in tone if you spl> were in a group of people in-person. in general you sound right about ML style, but in this case, ask around. you're wrong. However I am mistaken less often in person, I think. spl> I'm sorry for this "off-topic" post.... I just could not let spl> this go, after reading venom and vitriol for months from him. You don't sound sorry. You sound self-congradulatory and relieved. I can live with a bit of ad-hominem garbage, and I think a measured dose can help keep people interested and shake up yet-another-cool-link-oftheday list that's beginning to sound like a bunch of saccarine inspirational posters colorful birds and remote jungle waterfalls. However I think we had an argument of this sort before: if you want to attack me, I would consider your post more fair and appropriate if you put SOME on-topic substance in your mail, so that whatever ``vitriol'' there is on either side at least advances the discussion about BSD a bit. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trish at bsdunix.net Fri Dec 5 13:56:21 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:56:21 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> What's your opinion? Your opinion is that everyone is wrong because they don;t agree with you, and that everyone is a piece of sh** because they won;t be as "Open" as you, and you're better because you're more extremist, and honestly, all I see is an unhappy person who needs a reason to make everyone else around him unhappy. You would be much happier if you worried about yourself and what *you* posted, than what Murray posts, or whether BSD's have this solution or that solution, and whether you need to use linux compatibiity (when you spout the virtues of Ubuntu *linux* every chance you get, and I love ubuntu's way of doing things, but it seems like you need to complain and spit venom. Even this email proves it. I am a happy human being. I have a family, and I'm a Mom, and I make a good living. I'm on the PTA, and I left the world of "this OS is better, and this OS is dying" a long time ago, I like to read good technical discussions, not ones where you discuss how sad someone is when they don't do things the "Miles Nordin" way. And maybe you're right, you are as much of a d*** in person. Its nice to know. I'm glad we don;t see each other often. And if "if you're not happy with the situation and not willing to help change it, then walk away" is "asking someone to leave, then yes, I will ask people to leave. -Trish On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: >>>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: > > spl> stir up people's feelings so they *feel* > spl> insulted, no matter what their point of view regarding the > spl> issue is. > > Do you actually have a point of view, other than ``you're making me > feel bad, and I don't like it when you say fuck and shit, so I wish > you would leave''? > > I certainly never asked anyone to leave because of his opinions, but > you have. > > I think BSD is in a worse spot than five years ago, and the problem is > largely cultural, and the discussion's therefore relevant. If we > don't even have a safe place to talk honestly, then this really is a > disaster. > > spl> I doubt you would be so vehemently insulting in tone if you > spl> were in a group of people in-person. > > in general you sound right about ML style, but in this case, ask > around. you're wrong. > > However I am mistaken less often in person, I think. > > spl> I'm sorry for this "off-topic" post.... I just could not let > spl> this go, after reading venom and vitriol for months from him. > > You don't sound sorry. You sound self-congradulatory and relieved. > > I can live with a bit of ad-hominem garbage, and I think a measured > dose can help keep people interested and shake up > yet-another-cool-link-oftheday list that's beginning to sound like a > bunch of saccarine inspirational posters colorful birds and remote > jungle waterfalls. However I think we had an argument of this sort > before: if you want to attack me, I would consider your post more fair > and appropriate if you put SOME on-topic substance in your mail, so > that whatever ``vitriol'' there is on either side at least advances > the discussion about BSD a bit. > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk From carton at Ivy.NET Sat Dec 6 15:36:00 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:36:00 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> (Siobhan P. Lynch's message of "Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:56:21 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: spl> spout the virtues of Ubuntu *linux* every chance you get, the virtues are the parts we can learn from, not the failures. I think the *'s above may explain why my tone is troubling you. It seems like I've shocked you by complimenting Linux on a BSD list, when usually all we do is slam Linux to make ourselves feel better. If we've gotten to the point where any Linux compliment is shocking, then we're a bunch of blinking yes-men like those fools around Bush, and we need to be shocked out of it. I've done plenty of Linux-slamming, too, believe me! The intent is usually: * If you want Linux, you know where to get it. We're an alternative we think _some_ people will find superior. We won't pander to everyone, nor to play catch-up like Linux does to Windows. * Let's not copy XXX from Linux just because they're bigger. Our way has worked well for us. I lost both. I lost the first when I heard myself saying ``I want (a) stable system with (b) support for lots of notC programming languages like Haskell, Erlang, and Java and (c) good networking stack with stuff like policy routing, wireless, and firewalls that don't panic the kernel, ability to forward a jumbo frame without dumping core.'' The on second point BSD eventually buckled on almost everything the Linux refugees wanted to copy, one *BSD at a time. like PAM, an impatient binary-linking culture including an excessively-modularized kernel instead of embedded-friendly streamlined build tools and big static-linked images, userspace filesystems, X in the package collection so it can't be cross-built, parts of the core system depending on Perl, 'ps' and 'netstat' tools using abstract high-level ABI's rather than groveling kmem so they're no longer provably non-invasive and using the same codepath on coredumps as running systems, u.s.w. If you'll look through NetBSD lists ~eight years ago, my Linux criticism was mostly restatements of: ``Linux has no culture and no tradition except being anti-Windows. They write things in the quickest, sloppiest way possible, and their only standard of code quality is, works==good. Because of this, they're not building an enduring, teachable culture through their code base. BSD was a clean teaching system from the beginning and still is now, while Linux is just shoveling shit into a cauldron and bubbling off the water, never caring about the smell or the process so long as they can build something like a brick from it.'' so, now when I find BSD people being what I view as grossly negligent compared to the minimum standard of culture-conscious behavior in the Linux world, who-cares-works-for-me, the situation's reversed, and I'm like, ``wtf, guys?'' I don't see truth in my 1999 cheerleading any more, _particularly_ among the BSD users like us---we use BSD like Windows admins use Windows or like Mac zealots claim that Apple is perfect, because we know it and we're too old or lazy to learn other things. In 1999 the other BSD users I remember came to find a Way, but when I bring up something like a Way here, I get flamed ``I have a good job and am a mom. I just want to talk about technical things only.'' Culture has been the most important part of BSD since its beginnings: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3729&cid=1319245 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.html rivalry with Linux has been at the center of BSD culture, since Linux was worth running, which was VERY early---Linux 0.99.14 in ~1993 worked almost as well as 386BSD and had heaps more drivers and prebuilt packages. also this cool serifed VGA font with a bubble in the > and < glyphs that sealed the deal for me. BSD developers maybe do still have culture inside their heads, but I think it's been eviscerated now that there are no new supplicants begging to commit things to whom they can say ``this is an egregious hack. go rewrite it and make it better in ____ way.'' They still have some amazing developers and some brilliant SoC students, but what they don't have is enough interest to sustain their original culture---they have to accept ~everything as Linux did willingly from the start. The culture I originally admired has been, in the retrospect you see in mycroft's post, a failure. Also, as discussed the last time you blew up at me, I think their favoring the BSD license (1) is NIH-ism, (2) is defended by sound bites and platitudes more than good arguments, (3) has been devastating to BSD over the last two decades. The staggering amount of money the GPL mobilized and funneled into Linux _has_ to be the reason the work of that mongol hoarde puts BSD stability to shame, yet prominent BSD developers like Theo in the Reyk-HAL bickering (which was finally untangled by lawyers funded by FSF donations ), take absurd nonsensically-vindictive positions like ``we only have a license for liability protection. we want our code to be used as widely as possible by anyone no matter how little they give back, except not in Linux, they can't use it.'' And Ray was saying a bunch of developers are throwing heaps of time into rewriting things we already have just to strip the GPL off! When there aren't enough developers to fix staggeringly fundamental problems, I think this is crazy! but yah, 2009! NetBSD 5.0 is supposed to fix two of mycroft's 2006 crises: threads work, and there's a journaling filesystem. still no flash-friendly filesystem AFAIK, but by now they've probably resigned themselves to letting openwrt take over the embedded space. spl> I am a happy human being. I have a family, and I'm a Mom, and spl> I make a good living. I'm on the PTA, I don't want to talk about that kind of stuff here any more. I mean, if you want to unload, whatever, but don't get started again with this ad-hominem shit like you did last time, ``did you fail at something? Fail really bad?... the world owes you something... because youu've been beaten by it every time?... Grow up Miles,... Either way, you come off as a child throwing a temper tantrum,... you need counseling.'' Why are you dumping personal stuff about your family and job in response to a post I've made about software development models? Most of us have families and jobs. If my post about software culture made you want to pull pictures of your daughter out of your wallet like a prisoner about to be executed to point and say, ``see? I, too, can love! even though I am a mouth-breathing Mac OS user who pisses on the freedom others have fought to give me, and claims to represent a movement while collaborating in the pissing-away of a quarter century of tradition'' then, maybe it was a really good post. If now you're suddenly indignant because you feel like your, omg, family has been insulted somehow, then spare us: DON'T BRING THEM UP! Nor mine. And don't say ``sorry, I'm usually quiet, but [insulting bating attacking things about my private life],'' either. This is SO basic, and we've had this discussion before. Honestly I've not seen it happen before, ever, on the main BSD project lists. I don't think it even happens on lkml. spl> venom. Even this email proves it. *I'm* spouting venom? hmmm.... well, spl> You would be much happier if you worried about yourself and spl> what *you* posted same to you! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dan at langille.org Sat Dec 6 19:23:25 2008 From: dan at langille.org (Dan Langille) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:23:25 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: > > And if "if you're not happy with the situation and not willing to help > change it, then walk away" is "asking someone to leave, then yes, I > will ask people to leave. Generally, do not feed the trolls. -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ From carton at Ivy.NET Sun Dec 7 11:58:32 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:58:32 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [Miles Nordin] IPv6 problems with your DNS servers In-Reply-To: (Miles Nordin's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:04:36 -0500") References: Message-ID: >>>>> "c" == Miles Nordin writes: c> castrovalva:~$ time dig www.facebook.com aaaa @69.63.176.101 they never wrote back to me, but some time between last night and this morning this actually seems fixed! Maybe I'm temporarily getting the one load balancer with good software on it, but, yeah, awesome. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trish at bsdunix.net Mon Dec 8 06:50:41 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:50:41 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: Yeah, he just irks me.... he likes pissing in people's Cheerios... and in a way where even people who would agree with him otherwise are insulted by his tone. -Trish On Dec 6, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: >> >> And if "if you're not happy with the situation and not willing to >> help >> change it, then walk away" is "asking someone to leave, then yes, I >> will ask people to leave. > > > Generally, do not feed the trolls. > > -- > Dan Langille > http://langille.org/ > > > From carton at Ivy.NET Mon Dec 8 13:38:27 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:38:27 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: (Siobhan P. Lynch's message of "Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:50:41 -0500") References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: spl> he just irks me.... he likes [...] yup, I seem to. Talking about me in the third person + other persistent and immoderate disrespect == welcome to my killfile, Trish. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dan at radiusim.com Mon Dec 8 14:12:42 2008 From: dan at radiusim.com (Dan Colish) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:12:42 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch writes: > > spl> he just irks me.... he likes [...] > > yup, I seem to. > > Talking about me in the third person + other persistent and immoderate > disrespect == welcome to my killfile, Trish. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > what does this have to do with tech talks? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From george at ceetonetechnology.com Mon Dec 8 15:29:29 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:29:29 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] YouTube Channel for BSD Technical Talks In-Reply-To: References: <41FD0884-6E0A-495E-8BC0-E3F4B5DD470A@exit2shell.com> <7765c0380812040758h66df422y9c3acadb4d042a62@mail.gmail.com> <89F8DD14-3383-4F83-9DB5-F81B088607F5@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: <493D83A9.7020602@ceetonetechnology.com> Dan Colish wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Miles Nordin > wrote: > > >>>>> "spl" == Siobhan P Lynch > writes: > > spl> he just irks me.... he likes [...] > > yup, I seem to. > > Talking about me in the third person + other persistent and immoderate > disrespect == welcome to my killfile, Trish. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > what does this have to do with tech talks? Ditto. Enough. Move on please. g From matt at atopia.net Mon Dec 8 19:34:39 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:34:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box Message-ID: Hiya, If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! -Matt From matt at atopia.net Mon Dec 8 19:43:14 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:43:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: <45032026-1228783030-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1658867993-@bxe339.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <45032026-1228783030-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1658867993-@bxe339.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: Right, but that only allows rsync. The same effect would be used if sftp-server was set as the shell for sftp. On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, riegersteve at gmail.com wrote: > In etc passwd use rsync as the shell > > ------Original Message------ > From: Matt Juszczak > Sender: talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org > To: talk at lists.nycbug.org > Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box > Sent: Dec 8, 2008 16:34 > > Hiya, > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! > > -Matt > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > -- > Sent via Blackberry > I can be reached at 310-947-8565 From george at ceetonetechnology.com Mon Dec 8 19:42:53 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:42:53 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hiya, > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! There's an rsync-only shell out there that you can config and compile that's perfect, IMHO. It will also do chroot. And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by me on it http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html g From dan at langille.org Mon Dec 8 19:57:08 2008 From: dan at langille.org (Dan Langille) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:57:08 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <493DC264.1050503@langille.org> Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hiya, > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! As a contributor to the Bacula project, I'd install Bacula. http://www.bacula.org/ From matt at atopia.net Mon Dec 8 22:21:29 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:21:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: > And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by me on it > > http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html > > g > I'm gonna use this, thanks! From spork at bway.net Tue Dec 9 00:00:56 2008 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:00:56 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Matt Juszczak wrote: > >> And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by me on it >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html >> >> g >> > > I'm gonna use this, thanks! The linked article mentions it, but scponly is nice for this sort of thing, and it's also in the ports tree. http://www.sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/index.php Charles > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > From matt at atopia.net Tue Dec 9 00:16:41 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:16:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: > http://www.sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/index.php > > Charles Doesn't support rsync :( (a requirement of ours) From riegersteve at gmail.com Mon Dec 8 19:37:01 2008 From: riegersteve at gmail.com (riegersteve at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:37:01 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box Message-ID: <45032026-1228783030-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1658867993-@bxe339.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> In etc passwd use rsync as the shell ------Original Message------ From: Matt Juszczak Sender: talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org To: talk at lists.nycbug.org Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box Sent: Dec 8, 2008 16:34 Hiya, If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! -Matt _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk at lists.nycbug.org http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk -- Sent via Blackberry I can be reached at 310-947-8565 From dcolish at gmail.com Mon Dec 8 19:51:04 2008 From: dcolish at gmail.com (Dan Colish) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:51:04 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <7c21e7d30812081651w3a3c28b5j9ec2d72c80c1762e@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:42 PM, George Rosamond < george at ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > Matt Juszczak wrote: > > Hiya, > > > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their > > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each > > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? > > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps > > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! > > There's an rsync-only shell out there that you can config and compile > that's perfect, IMHO. > > It will also do chroot. > > And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by me > on it > > http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html > > g > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > I don't know about you guys, but I love s3 for backups. Its super easy to sync with is you use the s3sync ruby project. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Tue Dec 9 09:18:05 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:18:05 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hiya, > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up > their > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for > each > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what > else? > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and > perhaps > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! > > -Matt Have you considered installing rsyncd on each of the clients machines and then having your backup server pull from the clients? This eliminates all the issues with having to setup logins for everyone. On top of that, if the number of clients grow to the point where a single server can't keep up, it becomes easier to spread the job among multiple servers. -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From george at ceetonetechnology.com Tue Dec 9 09:37:16 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:37:16 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <493E829C.8080203@ceetonetechnology.com> Matt Juszczak wrote: > >> And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by >> me on it >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html >> >> g >> > > I'm gonna use this, thanks! > > If you do something interesting with this, let us know. It's pretty straight-forward, but it's nice that you get the source and can compile exactly what you need. It may *not* chroot in the config as I may be thinking of another remote shell in the fbsd ports. Since it hasn't been mentioned, you should probably go with ssh key authentication. . . with or without passwds depending on the context. George From mspitzer at gmail.com Mon Dec 8 23:48:58 2008 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:48:58 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8c50a3c30812082048u1b077f7fv449910b8cb834075@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hiya, > > If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk > space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their > data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a > given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each > client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? > Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps > sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. > > Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! > how parinoid do you need to be? you could put each customer in their own jail on one end of the spectrim or unix file permissions on the other. after that we can talk about how to do what you want. depending on the scale, number of clients, ZFS might be worth looking at. By default I would lean toward each having his own jail and possibly ip and if ip space is a problem then a bidirectional nat with everybody getting off ports for their access. marc -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. Albert Camus From matt at atopia.net Tue Dec 9 11:19:39 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:19:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Have you considered installing rsyncd on each of the clients machines > and then having your backup server pull from the clients? > > This eliminates all the issues with having to setup logins for everyone. > > On top of that, if the number of clients grow to the point where a > single > server can't keep up, it becomes easier to spread the job among multiple > servers. Yep, we considered the pull method, but many of these servers are self managed. From matt at atopia.net Tue Dec 9 11:20:31 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:20:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: <493E829C.8080203@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> <493E829C.8080203@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: > If you do something interesting with this, let us know. I will! > It's pretty straight-forward, but it's nice that you get the source and can > compile exactly what you need. Exactly. I like that. > It may *not* chroot in the config as I may be thinking of another remote > shell in the fbsd ports. OK. > Since it hasn't been mentioned, you should probably go with ssh key > authentication. . . with or without passwds depending on the context. Yup, a great idea. We're also only allowing authentication from the IP internal LAN anyway. From spork at bway.net Tue Dec 9 13:14:21 2008 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:14:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: <7c21e7d30812081651w3a3c28b5j9ec2d72c80c1762e@mail.gmail.com> References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> <7c21e7d30812081651w3a3c28b5j9ec2d72c80c1762e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:42 PM, George Rosamond < > george at ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > >> Matt Juszczak wrote: >>> Hiya, >>> >>> If you were given the task of setting up a FreeBSD box with 1 TB disk >>> space (mirrored RAID 1) for use by multiple clients for backing up their >>> data (mostly via rsync and sftp), how would you set it up? Yes, its a >>> given that one would use a minimalist install, create home dirs for each >>> client, enable quotas to keep file storage under control, but what else? >>> Is there a shell out there that ONLY allows the use of rsync and perhaps >>> sftp? I've seen rbash and people also set the shell to sftp-server. >>> >>> Just wondering how others would set this up. Thanks! >> >> There's an rsync-only shell out there that you can config and compile >> that's perfect, IMHO. >> >> It will also do chroot. >> >> And it's funny. . . was looking for the code, and found a posting by me >> on it >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/user-groups.bsd.nycbug/2005-11/msg00094.html I lost the reply to my post about the scponly restricted shell, but someone stated that it does not handle rsync. That's not the case. Do a "make config" in /usr/ports/shells/scponly - there is an option to add rsync compatibility and many other things like chroot and svn compat. Just an FYI... Charles From matt at atopia.net Tue Dec 9 13:55:29 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:55:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: <493DBF0D.60400@ceetonetechnology.com> <7c21e7d30812081651w3a3c28b5j9ec2d72c80c1762e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > I lost the reply to my post about the scponly restricted shell, but > someone stated that it does not handle rsync. That's not the case. Do a > "make config" in /usr/ports/shells/scponly - there is an option to add > rsync compatibility and many other things like chroot and svn compat. > > Just an FYI... > > Charles Oh wow, great! Thanks! From raj at brainlink.com Tue Dec 9 17:29:57 2008 From: raj at brainlink.com (Raj Goel) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:29:57 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Looking for a firewall guru Message-ID: <394889945-1228861751-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-255177169-@bxe257.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> BUGers, Am in need of someone who can setup a firewall that supports 802.1Q VLAN tagging. Call me at 917-685-7731. Rajesh Goel, CISSP cell (917) 685-7731 CTO: Brainlink International, Inc. "IT Crisis Management and Solutions" From akosela at andykosela.com Wed Dec 10 02:23:52 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:23:52 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD Message-ID: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> Who is using FreeBSD on production servers in the New York/New Jersey area? FreeBSD has historically been strong in the hosting services segment. New York Internet, DataPipe and DynDNS particularly come to my mind. But who else? I am perfectly aware that the trends nowadays are leaning towards Linux deployment, so who is still a heavy supporter of FreeBSD in New York? -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From lists at stringsutils.com Wed Dec 10 11:58:40 2008 From: lists at stringsutils.com (Francisco Reyes) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:58:40 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] =?iso-8859-1?q?Setting_up_a_FreeBSD_=22backup=22_bo?= =?iso-8859-1?q?x?= References: Message-ID: Matt Juszczak writes: > ....rsync... hell to sftp-server. In addition to rsync consider rdiff. Also check tarsnap http://tarsnap.com With compression AND deduplication of data tarsnap is extremely efficient if data doesn't change often/much. From george at ceetonetechnology.com Wed Dec 10 12:10:23 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:10:23 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Setting up a FreeBSD "backup" box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <493FF7FF.5060000@ceetonetechnology.com> Francisco Reyes wrote: > Matt Juszczak writes: > >> ....rsync... hell to sftp-server. > > In addition to rsync consider rdiff. > > > Also check tarsnap > http://tarsnap.com > > With compression AND deduplication of data tarsnap is extremely efficient if > data doesn't change often/much. Actually. . . I think the shell I was initially referring to was rssh, which is in the FBSD ports. It *does* allow chroot. http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh/index.shtml George From thomas at zaph.org Wed Dec 10 13:22:39 2008 From: thomas at zaph.org (N. J. Thomas) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:22:39 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081210182239.GT45883@zaph.org> * Andy Kosela [2008-12-10 08:23:52+0000]: > Who is using FreeBSD on production servers in the New York/New Jersey > area? I worked as sysadmin for a marketing firm (banner ads and such) near Wall St that was 100% FreeBSD on their production servers (about 40-50 boxes). I keep in touch with their current sysadmin and they have not changed their infrastructure and have no plans to do so. Thomas From lists at stringsutils.com Wed Dec 10 13:55:18 2008 From: lists at stringsutils.com (Francisco Reyes) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:55:18 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Andy Kosela writes: > are leaning towards Linux deployment, so who is still a heavy > supporter of FreeBSD in New York? There are probably many small companies that we would never find about. I guess your question is more along the lines of what large/recognized company is a big supporter of FreeBSD in NY. From akosela at andykosela.com Wed Dec 10 18:04:55 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:04:55 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Andy Kosela writes: > >> are leaning towards Linux deployment, so who is still a heavy >> supporter of FreeBSD in New York? > > There are probably many small companies that we would never find about. > I guess your question is more along the lines of what large/recognized > company is a big supporter of FreeBSD in NY. That's exactly what I had in my mind. From my experience, in larger corporations the adoption of FreeBSD is somewhat harder due to the business models these corporations are based upon. When they buy hardware from vendors like HP, EMC, IBM they also buy a whole fully supported software package that comes with it, and that means usually RHEL or even HP-UX/AIX. DataPipe and NYI are a nice exception to the general rule. Any Yahoo! sysadmins on this list? Has Yahoo got data centers located in NY/NJ areas running FreeBSD? -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From riegersteve at gmail.com Wed Dec 10 18:49:23 2008 From: riegersteve at gmail.com (Steve Rieger) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:49:23 -0800 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20081210182239.GT45883@zaph.org> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <20081210182239.GT45883@zaph.org> Message-ID: <49405583.3030200@gmail.com> N. J. Thomas wrote: > * Andy Kosela [2008-12-10 08:23:52+0000]: >> Who is using FreeBSD on production servers in the New York/New Jersey >> area? > > I worked as sysadmin for a marketing firm (banner ads and such) near > Wall St that was 100% FreeBSD on their production servers (about 40-50 > boxes). > > I keep in touch with their current sysadmin and they have not changed > their infrastructure and have no plans to do so. > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk TBWA, Chiat, Chiat Day, all use freebsd From jschauma at netmeister.org Wed Dec 10 21:44:00 2008 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:44:00 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081211024359.GA22860@netmeister.org> Andy Kosela wrote: > Any Yahoo! sysadmins on this list? Has Yahoo got data centers located > in NY/NJ areas running FreeBSD? Not all companies are necessarily at liberty to discuss (on a public mailing list, anyway) either the location of their datacenters nor the exact numbers of hosts running a given operating system (or version thereof). But it's no secret that Yahoo! does have a large number of hosts running FreeBSD. -Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available URL: From george at ceetonetechnology.com Thu Dec 11 10:20:36 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:20:36 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20081211024359.GA22860@netmeister.org> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> <20081211024359.GA22860@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <49412FC4.7030904@ceetonetechnology.com> Jan Schaumann wrote: > Andy Kosela wrote: > >> Any Yahoo! sysadmins on this list? Has Yahoo got data centers located >> in NY/NJ areas running FreeBSD? > > Not all companies are necessarily at liberty to discuss (on a public > mailing list, anyway) either the location of their datacenters nor the > exact numbers of hosts running a given operating system (or version > thereof). > > But it's no secret that Yahoo! does have a large number of hosts running > FreeBSD. Andy: A long while back, maybe five years ago, we attempted to do this with NYCBUG. . . . create a central database of NYC-area BSD using companies. With such a vague goal, ie, determining BSD-using firms for the sake of it, it's difficult. If you actually explain what your goal is, it might be a bit easier to provide some direction. . . eg., are you looking to apply for dev/sa jobs? are you cataloging BSD-based hardware solutions? do you have a service to provide to those firms? g From akosela at andykosela.com Thu Dec 11 14:10:07 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:10:07 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <49412FC4.7030904@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> <20081211024359.GA22860@netmeister.org> <49412FC4.7030904@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812111110s45832073qd6b04a2b447967d0@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, George Rosamond wrote: > A long while back, maybe five years ago, we attempted to do this with > NYCBUG. . . . create a central database of NYC-area BSD using companies. > > With such a vague goal, ie, determining BSD-using firms for the sake of > it, it's difficult. I don't see any official list on nycbug.org so I guess you didn't succeed or the decision was made not to disclose it. Netcraft.com can be a good source of information; at least for the www servers running FreeBSD, but I'm sure you already used it. > > If you actually explain what your goal is, it might be a bit easier to > provide some direction. . . > > eg., > > are you looking to apply for dev/sa jobs? > > are you cataloging BSD-based hardware solutions? > > do you have a service to provide to those firms? Yes, I would like to catalog FreeBSD shops in NYC area, (1) for general information as to the scale of FreeBSD adoption and deployment of FreeBSD servers in the NYC, and (2) as a New Yorker but not currently living in NY, I'm definetly interested in any opportunities for FreeBSD sysadmin work in the NYC. George, I think that such a list on nycbug.org would be beneficial to many. Not only it would point possible customers interested in BSD solutions to the right places, but also it would showcase that BSD presence in the NYC is strong and widespread. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From akosela at andykosela.com Thu Dec 11 14:27:41 2008 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:27:41 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <49405583.3030200@gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <20081210182239.GT45883@zaph.org> <49405583.3030200@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812111127l3fdd5a0wcba1454e77bf6f09@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Steve Rieger wrote: > TBWA, Chiat, Chiat Day, all use freebsd http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.tbwachiat.com It seems they are using Linux nowadays, at least for www. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From george at ceetonetechnology.com Thu Dec 11 14:52:09 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:52:09 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] NY/NJ companies using FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812111110s45832073qd6b04a2b447967d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80812092323u24a44f78o1bc682c5499b5b3a@mail.gmail.com> <3cc535c80812101504w66d9f32fu6f26da9d27a8825@mail.gmail.com> <20081211024359.GA22860@netmeister.org> <49412FC4.7030904@ceetonetechnology.com> <3cc535c80812111110s45832073qd6b04a2b447967d0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49416F69.4030701@ceetonetechnology.com> Andy Kosela wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, George Rosamond > wrote: >> A long while back, maybe five years ago, we attempted to do this with >> NYCBUG. . . . create a central database of NYC-area BSD using companies. >> >> With such a vague goal, ie, determining BSD-using firms for the sake of >> it, it's difficult. > > I don't see any official list on nycbug.org so I guess you didn't > succeed or the decision was made not to disclose it. Netcraft.com can > be a good source of information; at least for the www servers running > FreeBSD, but I'm sure you already used it. > >> If you actually explain what your goal is, it might be a bit easier to >> provide some direction. . . >> >> eg., >> >> are you looking to apply for dev/sa jobs? >> >> are you cataloging BSD-based hardware solutions? >> >> do you have a service to provide to those firms? > > Yes, I would like to catalog FreeBSD shops in NYC area, (1) for > general information as to the scale of FreeBSD adoption and deployment > of FreeBSD servers in the NYC, and (2) as a New Yorker but not > currently living in NY, I'm definetly interested in any opportunities > for FreeBSD sysadmin work in the NYC. For the second, post yourself to the jobs@ list, I'd recommend. > > George, I think that such a list on nycbug.org would be beneficial to > many. Not only it would point possible customers interested in BSD > solutions to the right places, but also it would showcase that BSD > presence in the NYC is strong and widespread. > We'd have to dig up the old list. . . but it wasn't exactly deep on any level. It was basically a handful of small shops out of a layer of NYCBUG members. Plus "oh, I think such-and-such company uses a BSD." Not really worth it. The best starting point, if you do intend to embark on such a list yourself, is to look at donations to the projects and various related projects (like OpenSSH). And add on sponsors to list of BSD cons. Of course you'd have to sift through those lists to find out. NetCraft is fine for looking at public facing servers that are on the relevant companies well known FQDNs. I think, for instance, some of Microsoft's Hotmail periphery servers are still FBSD boxes. (what a long horrible migration process). It might be less time consuming and more accurate to just do an nmap script with -O on all IP blocks. . good luck :) But remember, even with enormous nmap sweeps with -O, you're only hitting public facing IPs. You'll probably hit some netscalers, eg, that use bsd kernels on their hardware. As you probably know, there's also the BSDStats project (on fbsd sysutils/bsdstats) which has a corresponding www site. Maybe just take a step back and look at the methodology others use for OS stats. . . but remember the weaknesses mentioned above. Let us know. g From thomas at zaph.org Mon Dec 15 13:26:56 2008 From: thomas at zaph.org (N. J. Thomas) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:26:56 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] zen.spamhaus.org (OT) Message-ID: <20081215182656.GC80477@zaph.org> The last few weeks I've seen an increase in spam getting through my personal SpamAssassin filters. Up until recently, SA was working quite well and I only had 1 or 2 get through every week -- a number I could live with. But this morning I had about a dozen come through, so I just configured my mail servers to use the zen.spamhaus.org DNSBL. So far it's done a pretty good job, my two FreeBSD servers running Postfix has rejected 44 pieces of spam in the last 45 minutes since I started it, which is fantastic. But it's been a while since I followed the DNSBL news, so I wanted to know what is the current thinking on Spamhaus? Are they too strict? Are they not strict enough? Are there other blacklists I should be using? thanks, Thomas From andy.kosela at gmail.com Mon Dec 15 14:54:43 2008 From: andy.kosela at gmail.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:54:43 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] zen.spamhaus.org (OT) In-Reply-To: <20081215182656.GC80477@zaph.org> References: <20081215182656.GC80477@zaph.org> Message-ID: <3cc535c80812151154h7237abd9n3a8f974ed81ed09e@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:26 PM, N. J. Thomas wrote: > > Are there other blacklists I should be using? > This is what I'm using at the moment. Works good so far: reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From marco at metm.org Mon Dec 15 15:47:55 2008 From: marco at metm.org (marco scoffier) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:47:55 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] zen.spamhaus.org (OT) In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812151154h7237abd9n3a8f974ed81ed09e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081215182656.GC80477@zaph.org> <3cc535c80812151154h7237abd9n3a8f974ed81ed09e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4946C27B.2090509@metm.org> Andy Kosela wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:26 PM, N. J. Thomas wrote: > >> Are there other blacklists I should be using? >> >> > > This is what I'm using at the moment. Works good so far: > > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org > > For my use, I find all blacklists too restrictive Many of my users have to get mail from people who use free.fr a hugely popular, free and very crappy French provider which always gets its servers on blacklists. Same for Korean, Japanese and Chinese friends using sketchy Asian providers (mobile phone weirdness etc.) If your communications are the slightest bit international I find using blacklists is impossible. the best solution I have found is still greylisting and only greylisting. Marco From maddaemon at gmail.com Mon Dec 15 18:49:40 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:49:40 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question Message-ID: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> List, I'm hoping someone can help me with this... I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with differnt IP addresses. For example, here are 2 lines: Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the webmail server. I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around the logic. TIA From jschauma at netmeister.org Mon Dec 15 20:46:02 2008 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:46:02 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081216014602.GA5565@netmeister.org> "maddaemon at gmail.com" wrote: > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 Split into timestamp, line and IP. Use a hash: if $line matched "abc1234 tried logging in from" if ! $line_by_ts{$timestamp} $line_by_ts{$timestamp} = $ip else if $ip != $line_by_ts{$timestamp} # dupe with different ip else # dupe with same ip endif endif endif awk or perl should do. -Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nycbug at cyth.net Tue Dec 16 00:53:28 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:52:28 +1859 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7765c0380812152153v12bd2476q5cdc2c61b6829cff@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:48 PM, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: > List, > > I'm hoping someone can help me with this... > > I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login > info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with > differnt IP addresses. > > For example, here are 2 lines: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the > webmail server. > > I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a > duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file > contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where > the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to > remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using > sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + > IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around > the logic. Does "sort -unsk1,9" work? You'd have to split the files according to month, though. -Ray- From maddaemon at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 10:37:34 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:37:34 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <20081216014602.GA5565@netmeister.org> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <20081216014602.GA5565@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <6c1774c50812160737y64dd43efs21696299a59acd99@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > "maddaemon at gmail.com" wrote: > >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > Split into timestamp, line and IP. Use a hash: > > if $line matched "abc1234 tried logging in from" > if ! $line_by_ts{$timestamp} > $line_by_ts{$timestamp} = $ip > else > if $ip != $line_by_ts{$timestamp} > # dupe with different ip > else > # dupe with same ip > endif > endif > endif > > awk or perl should do. > > -Jan That looks like it might work, except for the fact that there are a possible 300+ user IDs that might be in the list. Is there a way in this line: if $line matched "abc1234 tried logging in from" to use a variable instead of "abc1234"? From bonsaime at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 12:37:53 2008 From: bonsaime at gmail.com (Jesse Callaway) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:37:53 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812160737y64dd43efs21696299a59acd99@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <20081216014602.GA5565@netmeister.org> <6c1774c50812160737y64dd43efs21696299a59acd99@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Jan Schaumann > wrote: > > "maddaemon at gmail.com" wrote: > > > >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > > > Split into timestamp, line and IP. Use a hash: > > > > if $line matched "abc1234 tried logging in from" > > if ! $line_by_ts{$timestamp} > > $line_by_ts{$timestamp} = $ip > > else > > if $ip != $line_by_ts{$timestamp} > > # dupe with different ip > > else > > # dupe with same ip > > endif > > endif > > endif > > > > awk or perl should do. > > > > -Jan > > That looks like it might work, except for the fact that there are a > possible 300+ user IDs that might be in the list. Is there a way in > this line: > > if $line matched "abc1234 tried logging in from" > > to use a variable instead of "abc1234"? > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > No, perl and awk only have limited text processing functions, it has to be an official timestamp. -jesse -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maddaemon at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 10:56:01 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:01 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <7765c0380812152153v12bd2476q5cdc2c61b6829cff@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <7765c0380812152153v12bd2476q5cdc2c61b6829cff@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6c1774c50812160756y475ef831oeab5807494f125c4@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Ray Lai wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:48 PM, maddaemon at gmail.com > wrote: >> List, >> >> I'm hoping someone can help me with this... >> >> I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login >> info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with >> differnt IP addresses. >> >> For example, here are 2 lines: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the >> webmail server. >> >> I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a >> duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file >> contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where >> the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to >> remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using >> sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + >> IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around >> the logic. > > Does "sort -unsk1,9" work? You'd have to split the files according to > month, though. > > -Ray- > That cuts everything out and leaves 1 line (with the DC IP, which is what I'm trying to get rid of): md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | wc -l 24 md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | sort -unsk1,9 Dec 16 01:00:57 - def3456 tried logging in from 192.168.8.3 md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ I'm doing this every day, so the day/month/year will always be a constant for that particular day. I guess what I'm trying to do could be described as finding "almost" or "partial" duplicates.. From mspitzer at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 13:40:47 2008 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:40:47 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812160756y475ef831oeab5807494f125c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <7765c0380812152153v12bd2476q5cdc2c61b6829cff@mail.gmail.com> <6c1774c50812160756y475ef831oeab5807494f125c4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8c50a3c30812161040o5f51bf6drc50d5ef91f1f0546@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Ray Lai wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:48 PM, maddaemon at gmail.com >> wrote: >>> List, >>> >>> I'm hoping someone can help me with this... >>> >>> I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login >>> info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with >>> differnt IP addresses. >>> >>> For example, here are 2 lines: >>> >>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >>> >>> where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the >>> webmail server. >>> >>> I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a >>> duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file >>> contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where >>> the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to >>> remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: >>> >>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >>> >>> Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using >>> sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + >>> IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around >>> the logic. >> >> Does "sort -unsk1,9" work? You'd have to split the files according to >> month, though. >> >> -Ray- >> > > That cuts everything out and leaves 1 line (with the DC IP, which is > what I'm trying to get rid of): > > md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | wc -l > 24 > md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | sort -unsk1,9 > Dec 16 01:00:57 - def3456 tried logging in from 192.168.8.3 > md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ > > I'm doing this every day, so the day/month/year will always be a > constant for that particular day. > > I guess what I'm trying to do could be described as finding "almost" > or "partial" duplicates.. No code but some advice: 1: figure out how to specify you lines of interest in terms of a regular expression, if possible. 2: from said RE pull out the pieces that you need to verify as uniq and pass to a test function, concat interesting bits and use as a key into a hash, ie if not seen as key in hash return true and set hash else return false 3: in your main loop if you match your RE then check and print or skip otherwise print 3->1->2 done. The hardest part of this is specifying the RE, "exactly" what do I care about. probably best to not do in shell. perl, ruby or tcl etc. would be better. back to work, marc -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. Albert Camus From maddaemon at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 16:31:54 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:31:54 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <8c50a3c30812161040o5f51bf6drc50d5ef91f1f0546@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <7765c0380812152153v12bd2476q5cdc2c61b6829cff@mail.gmail.com> <6c1774c50812160756y475ef831oeab5807494f125c4@mail.gmail.com> <8c50a3c30812161040o5f51bf6drc50d5ef91f1f0546@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6c1774c50812161331g3eb4b91es5f76c953aec0be80@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Marc Spitzer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM, maddaemon at gmail.com > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Ray Lai wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:48 PM, maddaemon at gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> List, >>>> >>>> I'm hoping someone can help me with this... >>>> >>>> I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login >>>> info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with >>>> differnt IP addresses. >>>> >>>> For example, here are 2 lines: >>>> >>>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >>>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >>>> >>>> where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the >>>> webmail server. >>>> >>>> I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a >>>> duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file >>>> contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where >>>> the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to >>>> remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: >>>> >>>> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >>>> >>>> Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using >>>> sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + >>>> IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around >>>> the logic. >>> >>> Does "sort -unsk1,9" work? You'd have to split the files according to >>> month, though. >>> >>> -Ray- >>> >> >> That cuts everything out and leaves 1 line (with the DC IP, which is >> what I'm trying to get rid of): >> >> md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | wc -l >> 24 >> md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ cat badpass.log | sort -unsk1,9 >> Dec 16 01:00:57 - def3456 tried logging in from 192.168.8.3 >> md at madmartigan [~/scripts/report_temp]$ >> >> I'm doing this every day, so the day/month/year will always be a >> constant for that particular day. >> >> I guess what I'm trying to do could be described as finding "almost" >> or "partial" duplicates.. > > No code but some advice: > > 1: figure out how to specify you lines of interest in terms of a > regular expression, if possible. What's making this a challenge is the fact that I'm comparing 2 lines, with no reference (i.e. line 2 and 3, or 4 and 5) because they're dynamic. If it was 1 line, or 2 static lines, it wouldn't be an issue for me. > 2: from said RE pull out the pieces that you need to verify as uniq > and pass to a test function, concat interesting bits and use as a key > into a hash, ie if not seen as key in hash return true and set hash > else return false You lost me after uniq ... > 3: in your main loop if you match your RE then check and print or skip > otherwise print > > 3->1->2 done. > > The hardest part of this is specifying the RE, "exactly" what do I care about. The timestamp, UID, and IP > probably best to not do in shell. perl, ruby or tcl etc. would be better. If I knew those, I'd be set :) > back to work, > > marc From okan at demirmen.com Tue Dec 16 16:45:16 2008 From: okan at demirmen.com (Okan Demirmen) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:45:16 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081216214516.GB18129@clam.khaoz.org> On Mon 2008.12.15 at 18:49 -0500, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: > List, > > I'm hoping someone can help me with this... > > I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login > info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with > differnt IP addresses. > > For example, here are 2 lines: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the > webmail server. > > I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a > duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file > contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where > the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to > remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using > sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + > IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around > the logic. you need context - see http://www.estpak.ee/~risto/sec/ From ike at lesmuug.org Tue Dec 16 19:10:47 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:10:47 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? Message-ID: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> Hey All, For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the wrong md5 checksum: http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/install44.iso $ cat MD5 | grep install44 MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c $ openssl md5 install44.iso MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and I'm not sure who to contact... Thanks in advance folks! Rocket- .ike From ike at lesmuug.org Tue Dec 16 20:05:14 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:05:14 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> References: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: Hi All, Again, a *different* incorrect checksum for the same file, same mirror: On Dec 16, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: > Hey All, > > For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? > > My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the > wrong md5 checksum: The ISO: > http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/install44.iso MD5 list (from mirror servers): > $ cat MD5 | grep install44 > MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c INCORRECT first download: > $ openssl md5 install44.iso > MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b INCORRECT DIFFERENT second download (same server): $ openssl md5 install44.iso MD5(install44.iso)= 48410b38aaac72727fb950bae37a94e8 -- From another mirror, CORRECT checksum: $ openssl md5 install44.iso MD5(install44.iso)= 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c > > > I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. > > I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and I'm not > sure who to contact... > > Thanks in advance folks! > > Rocket- > .ike Rocket- .ike From mspitzer at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 23:50:17 2008 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:50:17 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] off topic, its not what you think Message-ID: <8c50a3c30812162050h2c0516b0ged230bdd2f88f34@mail.gmail.com> http://fuckyoupenguin.blogspot.com/ -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. Albert Camus From nycbug at cyth.net Wed Dec 17 01:33:29 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:33:29 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> References: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <7765c0380812162233t6994ccbdtd33403e0687c4617@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: > Hey All, > > For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? > > My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the > wrong md5 checksum: > http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/install44.iso > > $ cat MD5 | grep install44 > MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c > $ openssl md5 install44.iso > MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b > > I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. > > I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and I'm not > sure who to contact... > > Thanks in advance folks! > > Rocket- > .ike > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > mirror at 24-7-solutions.net according to cvsweb: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/build/mirrors.dat.diff?r1=1.134;r2=1.135;f=h From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Dec 17 01:45:29 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:45:29 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <7765c0380812162233t6994ccbdtd33403e0687c4617@mail.gmail.com> References: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> <7765c0380812162233t6994ccbdtd33403e0687c4617@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <46BEFD76-EAC0-404C-9A10-116E3D1B4556@lesmuug.org> On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:33 AM, Ray Lai wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? >> >> My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the >> wrong md5 checksum: >> http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/install44.iso >> >> $ cat MD5 | grep install44 >> MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c >> $ openssl md5 install44.iso >> MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b >> >> I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. >> >> I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and I'm >> not >> sure who to contact... >> >> Thanks in advance folks! >> >> Rocket- >> .ike >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk at lists.nycbug.org >> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > > mirror at 24-7-solutions.net according to cvsweb: Cool, thanks, but before I shoot them an email, > > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/build/mirrors.dat.diff?r1=1.134;r2=1.135;f=h can you explain this quick to me? Rocket- .ike From nycbug at cyth.net Wed Dec 17 01:53:20 2008 From: nycbug at cyth.net (Ray Lai) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:53:20 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <46BEFD76-EAC0-404C-9A10-116E3D1B4556@lesmuug.org> References: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> <7765c0380812162233t6994ccbdtd33403e0687c4617@mail.gmail.com> <46BEFD76-EAC0-404C-9A10-116E3D1B4556@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <7765c0380812162253qd62d3a4r4957515013b775be@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Isaac Levy wrote: > On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:33 AM, Ray Lai wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: >>> >>> Hey All, >>> >>> For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? >>> >>> My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the >>> wrong md5 checksum: >>> http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/install44.iso >>> >>> $ cat MD5 | grep install44 >>> MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c >>> $ openssl md5 install44.iso >>> MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b >>> >>> I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. >>> >>> I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and I'm not >>> sure who to contact... >>> >>> Thanks in advance folks! >>> >>> Rocket- >>> .ike >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk at lists.nycbug.org >>> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >>> >> >> mirror at 24-7-solutions.net according to cvsweb: > > Cool, thanks, but before I shoot them an email, > >> >> >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/build/mirrors.dat.diff?r1=1.134;r2=1.135;f=h > > can you explain this quick to me? I tracked down the change to ftp.html using cvs annotate that last touched ftp.html, to see if maybe the commit log included some contact info. I discovered it was generated by build/mirrors.dat, so I looked at the commit that was made at the same time ftp.html was regenerated (May 30, 2008), which pointed me to the diff I saw. At that time I realized that mirrors.dat actually contains the mirror maintainer's e-mail. Long story short, you can find the mirror maintainer's e-mail at build/mirrors.dat. -Ray- From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Dec 17 01:57:47 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:57:47 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD 4.4 bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <7765c0380812162253qd62d3a4r4957515013b775be@mail.gmail.com> References: <4997889F-8C62-4E8D-A681-D0C68CB6021A@lesmuug.org> <7765c0380812162233t6994ccbdtd33403e0687c4617@mail.gmail.com> <46BEFD76-EAC0-404C-9A10-116E3D1B4556@lesmuug.org> <7765c0380812162253qd62d3a4r4957515013b775be@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <875EB1CE-5E50-4BB2-A4F5-BC769E205BA0@lesmuug.org> On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Ray Lai wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Isaac Levy wrote: >> On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:33 AM, Ray Lai wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> For the OpenBSD folks here- whom do I report a bad checksum to? >>>> >>>> My download of this ISO from a mirror, I believe, is giving me the >>>> wrong md5 checksum: >>>> http://mirrors.24-7-solutions.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/i386/ >>>> install44.iso >>>> >>>> $ cat MD5 | grep install44 >>>> MD5 (install44.iso) = 6bff6dd0f2a703e5f99a82ed3e120b6c >>>> $ openssl md5 install44.iso >>>> MD5(install44.iso)= f3ad84cdde68754d6ac03ccce862165b >>>> >>>> I downloaded from another mirror and the checksum looks great. >>>> >>>> I looked around at the mirror's site, (24-7-solutions.net) and >>>> I'm not >>>> sure who to contact... >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance folks! >>>> >>>> Rocket- >>>> .ike >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing list >>>> talk at lists.nycbug.org >>>> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >>>> >>> >>> mirror at 24-7-solutions.net according to cvsweb: >> >> Cool, thanks, but before I shoot them an email, >> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/build/mirrors.dat.diff?r1=1.134;r2=1.135;f=h >> >> can you explain this quick to me? > > I tracked down the change to ftp.html using cvs annotate that last > touched ftp.html, to see if maybe the commit log included some contact > info. I discovered it was generated by build/mirrors.dat, so I looked > at the commit that was made at the same time ftp.html was regenerated > (May 30, 2008), which pointed me to the diff I saw. At that time I > realized that mirrors.dat actually contains the mirror maintainer's > e-mail. > > Long story short, you can find the mirror maintainer's e-mail at > build/mirrors.dat. > > -Ray- Excellent- thanks Ray! Rocket- .ike From robin.polak at gmail.com Wed Dec 17 10:52:04 2008 From: robin.polak at gmail.com (Robin Polak) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:52:04 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] off topic, its not what you think In-Reply-To: <8c50a3c30812162050h2c0516b0ged230bdd2f88f34@mail.gmail.com> References: <8c50a3c30812162050h2c0516b0ged230bdd2f88f34@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <551868240812170752h6c479229m94013b1f9ce51059@mail.gmail.com> OMG, This blog is is seriously the most entering material I have read in a long time. On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 23:50, Marc Spitzer wrote: > http://fuckyoupenguin.blogspot.com/ > > > -- > Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. > Albert Camus > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Robin Polak E-Mail: robin.polak at gmail.com V. 917-494-2080 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From george at ceetonetechnology.com Wed Dec 17 11:11:44 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:11:44 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Sahana software Message-ID: <494924C0.10703@ceetonetechnology.com> Anyone on this list heard of Sahana (.lk)? It's a Sri Lankan-originated disaster recovery coordination software prompted by the 2005 tsunami. PHP/MySQL. . . LGPL-licensed. Met some of the developers last week. . . Was removed a while back from FBSD ports. . . g From chsnyder at gmail.com Wed Dec 17 13:01:42 2008 From: chsnyder at gmail.com (csnyder) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:01:42 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] off topic, its not what you think In-Reply-To: <8c50a3c30812162050h2c0516b0ged230bdd2f88f34@mail.gmail.com> References: <8c50a3c30812162050h2c0516b0ged230bdd2f88f34@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Marc Spitzer wrote: > http://fuckyoupenguin.blogspot.com/ > Hey, thanks. I'm going to start using those as cms test posts, instead of lorem ipsum or random Wikipedia articles. From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Wed Dec 17 11:43:58 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:43:58 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Sahana software In-Reply-To: <494924C0.10703@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <494924C0.10703@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <612292B8-3F7D-468A-BCF2-A922549C8F26@exit2shell.com> On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:11 AM, George Rosamond wrote: > Anyone on this list heard of Sahana (.lk)? > > It's a Sri Lankan-originated disaster recovery coordination software > prompted by the 2005 tsunami. PHP/MySQL. . . LGPL-licensed. > > Met some of the developers last week. . . > > Was removed a while back from FBSD ports. . . > Looks like it was removed from the ports because it has conflicting dependancies, requiring modules that either used php4 and php5. Since the maintainer never bothered to correct the port it was marked for deletion. If someone was interested in fixing the issues, it can be added back into the ports tree. -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From jkeen at verizon.net Wed Dec 17 22:16:06 2008 From: jkeen at verizon.net (James E Keenan) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:16:06 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48AC10A3-60AA-4184-A6EF-1C38B0551668@verizon.net> > > > For example, here are 2 lines: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the > webmail server. > > I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a > duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file > contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where > the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to > remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: > > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > > Perhaps this: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my @last = ( '', '', '' ); my @this; my $pattern = qr/^ ([a-zA-Z]{3}\s\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}) # date string \s-\s (\w+) # username .*? (\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}) # IP address $/x; while (my $firstline = ) { if ($firstline =~ /$pattern/) { @last = ( $1, $2, $3 ); last; } } while (my $l = ) { if ($l =~ /$pattern/) { @this = ( $1, $2, $3 ); if ( $this[0] eq $last[0] and $this[1] eq $last[1] ) { $last[2] = $this[2]; } else { print ( ( join '|' => @last ), "\n" ); @last = @this; } } } print ( ( join '|' => @last ), "\n" ); __DATA__ Dec 15 05:15:33 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 Dec 15 05:16:03 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.18.43 Dec 15 05:16:03 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.220 Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.220 Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.221 Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.79 Dec 15 05:16:07 - vig1234 tried logging in from 192.168.15.79 From lists at stringsutils.com Thu Dec 18 10:10:35 2008 From: lists at stringsutils.com (Francisco Reyes) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:10:35 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: maddaemon at gmail.com writes: > I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a > duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file > contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where If python is acceptable.... Test data Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 Dec 15 06:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.14 Dec 15 06:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Dec 15 07:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.15 Dec 15 08:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 Program #!/usr/bin/python import sys line=sys.stdin.readline() while True: if not line: break items = line.split() CurrentTimeStamp=items[0]+" "+items[1]+" "+items[2] TimeStamp=CurrentTimeStamp PrintIP="" while CurrentTimeStamp==TimeStamp: IP=items[9] if PrintIP=="" or PrintIP=="192.168.8.17": PrintIP=IP line=sys.stdin.readline() if not line: break items = line.split() TimeStamp=items[0]+" "+items[1]+" "+items[2] print CurrentTimeStamp+" "+PrintIP Output Dec 15 05:15:56 192.168.18.13 Dec 15 06:15:56 192.168.18.14 Dec 15 07:15:56 192.168.18.15 Dec 15 08:15:56 192.168.8.17 Should not be difficult to convert to another language. In case the email trashes the spacing.. http://public.natserv.net/test.py http://public.natserv.net/test.txt Hope this is what you were looking for. From maddaemon at gmail.com Thu Dec 18 11:19:09 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:19:09 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <20081216214516.GB18129@clam.khaoz.org> References: <6c1774c50812151549q61d69efer804b47acd06246e0@mail.gmail.com> <20081216214516.GB18129@clam.khaoz.org> Message-ID: <6c1774c50812180819se5be2bck771062fc7722553a@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > On Mon 2008.12.15 at 18:49 -0500, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: >> List, >> >> I'm hoping someone can help me with this... >> >> I'm trying to search for a pattern in a text file that contains login >> info from a syslog and weed out entries that are duplicated with >> differnt IP addresses. >> >> For example, here are 2 lines: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the >> webmail server. >> >> I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a >> duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file >> contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where >> the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to >> remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> Does anyone know how to go about doing this? I was going to try using >> sed and compare the lines looking for the same timestamp + username + >> IP1/IP2, but it gave me a headache when I tried to wrap my head around >> the logic. > > you need context - see http://www.estpak.ee/~risto/sec/ I've checked out SEC for other things, but I'm actually using OSSEC-HIDS for the real-time alerting, and it's awesome for that. This is for the daily report that gets generated every morning on the previous days' syslog data, containing such things as new user accounts created, accounts deleted, locked out accounts, and so on. The problem started when we added 2 servers running a new Windows O/S that use different Windows EventIDs for a failed login attempt. Since adding that part, I'm getting numerous duplicates because logging into webmail produces 2 entries - the webmail server IP (or another service such as that) and the DC IP. I'm only interested in the originating IP for the report. From slynch2112 at me.com Thu Dec 18 10:20:49 2008 From: slynch2112 at me.com (Siobhan Lynch) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:20:49 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] PostgreSQL help? Message-ID: <07220F84-F35D-4B2A-89B5-A2738CD5AAED@me.com> Does anyone here know anyone good with postgresql that I can ask a few questions, or possibly even hire to help us with some maintenance. I need the person to be fairly advanced with pgsql. -Trish From alex at pilosoft.com Thu Dec 18 18:46:53 2008 From: alex at pilosoft.com (Alex Pilosov) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:46:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: *stab* *stab* Freebsd sysinstall doesn't support GPT? Freebsd loader in 7.0 doesn't support booting off GPT partition? How the *(@#(*@(*#&*#$ are you supposed to use disks that are >2TB in size?! I know the answer: try to install it as MBR partitioning, hotwire it into GPT partitioning scheme, hopefully not breaking MBR-based loader, and cross your fingers. die freebsd die already. -alex From ike at lesmuug.org Thu Dec 18 20:09:46 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:09:46 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1C81A77E-3D62-46BF-815A-E819EA960DE1@lesmuug.org> On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Alex Pilosov wrote: > *stab* *stab* *Watch it- you stabbed me in the shins Alex.* > > > Freebsd sysinstall doesn't support GPT? Freebsd loader in 7.0 doesn't > support booting off GPT partition? > > How the *(@#(*@(*#&*#$ are you supposed to use disks that are >2TB in > size?! > > I know the answer: try to install it as MBR partitioning, hotwire it > into > GPT partitioning scheme, hopefully not breaking MBR-based loader, and > cross your fingers. EFI uses GPT, BIOS uses a MBR. GPT is somewhat new man... introduced with ia64, (I could be wrong here, but it's still relatively new)? > die freebsd die already. > > -alex And happy holidays to you too Alex! Rocket- .ike From carton at Ivy.NET Thu Dec 18 20:32:55 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:32:55 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: <1C81A77E-3D62-46BF-815A-E819EA960DE1@lesmuug.org> (Isaac Levy's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:09:46 -0500") References: <1C81A77E-3D62-46BF-815A-E819EA960DE1@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: >>>>> "il" == Isaac Levy writes: il> EFI uses GPT, BIOS uses a MBR. yeah solaris has the same problem and cannot boot off GPT-labeled disks (on i386 or sparc). though I wouldn't be surprised if Linux found some way to make it work. There was one report of nVidia RAID BIOS that would hang at startup if exposed to a GPT label (solaris people tend to call them ``EFI labels'' because some of their format tools use that stupid name): http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=18211 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alex at pilosoft.com Thu Dec 18 20:38:59 2008 From: alex at pilosoft.com (Alex Pilosov) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:38:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "il" == Isaac Levy writes: > > il> EFI uses GPT, BIOS uses a MBR. > > yeah solaris has the same problem and cannot boot off GPT-labeled > disks (on i386 or sparc). > > though I wouldn't be surprised if Linux found some way to make it work. it just works, actually, on centos. on debian, you kinda need to do a dance to get it to work. but it does work. -alex From george at ceetonetechnology.com Thu Dec 18 20:40:21 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:40:21 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Sahana software In-Reply-To: <612292B8-3F7D-468A-BCF2-A922549C8F26@exit2shell.com> References: <494924C0.10703@ceetonetechnology.com> <612292B8-3F7D-468A-BCF2-A922549C8F26@exit2shell.com> Message-ID: <494AFB85.7030909@ceetonetechnology.com> Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:11 AM, George Rosamond wrote: > >> Anyone on this list heard of Sahana (.lk)? >> >> It's a Sri Lankan-originated disaster recovery coordination software >> prompted by the 2005 tsunami. PHP/MySQL. . . LGPL-licensed. >> >> Met some of the developers last week. . . >> >> Was removed a while back from FBSD ports. . . >> > > Looks like it was removed from the ports because it has conflicting > dependancies, > requiring modules that either used php4 and php5. Yeah. . . caught that. > > Since the maintainer never bothered to correct the port it was marked > for deletion. > > If someone was interested in fixing the issues, it can be added back > into the ports > tree. > Hans and I attempted to install. . . a bit of a mess right now. Maybe we'll see how it installs on a Linux. We launched a mailing list about the app. . . since it's larger role is important, and it's certainly worth resurrecting a BSD port. http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/sahana George From ike at lesmuug.org Thu Dec 18 20:43:35 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:43:35 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Dec 18, 2008, at 8:38 PM, Alex Pilosov wrote: > on debian, you kinda need to do a dance to get it to work. Oy- I'm downloading the ISO now- I truly miss good-ol' MKLinux! Rocket- .ike From andy.kosela at gmail.com Fri Dec 19 02:06:30 2008 From: andy.kosela at gmail.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:06:30 +0100 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3cc535c80812182306v751eb956secba7794a43d9e1c@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Alex Pilosov wrote: > Freebsd sysinstall doesn't support GPT? Freebsd loader in 7.0 doesn't > support booting off GPT partition? >From 6.4-RELEASE announcement: - boot loader changes allow, among other things, booting from USB devices and booting from GPT-labeled devices with GPT-enabled BIOSes. So it seems FreeBSD *has* the ability to boot off GPT, although personally I did not test it. -- Andy Kosela ora et labora From ike at lesmuug.org Fri Dec 19 10:14:24 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:14:24 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80812182306v751eb956secba7794a43d9e1c@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80812182306v751eb956secba7794a43d9e1c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Dec 19, 2008, at 2:06 AM, Andy Kosela wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Alex Pilosov > wrote: >> Freebsd sysinstall doesn't support GPT? Freebsd loader in 7.0 doesn't >> support booting off GPT partition? > >> From 6.4-RELEASE announcement: > - boot loader changes allow, among other things, booting from USB > devices and booting from GPT-labeled devices with GPT-enabled BIOSes. > > So it seems FreeBSD *has* the ability to boot off GPT, although > personally I did not test it. Yes- FreeBSD absolutely has the ability to boot off GPT. However, the FreeBSD installer software, indeed does not yet recognize GPT. I submitted a PR about it just now- it'll be up in the system soon if not yet, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129762 This way someone will get around to fixing sysinstall, so newbies can install on harddrives larger than 2TB. It'll hopefully (likely) get dealt with before > 2TB SATA drives hit the street... -- Alex- while I know you like to stab, and I like to brawl with you ;) Wining about the problem however is a bit inane, (a UNIX veteran like yourself can deal with gpt(8) man page etc... and get it installed). Or even, you can use the MBR hack, (necessary for BIOS based machines!) However, your problem is extremely valid- in 2 cases: - if you are trying to install on a volume greater than 2TB (currently not a task for newbies, or even most users) - if you have a machine with GPT already installed via Linux or other OS -- (Dreamy mumble- BTW what the heck am I doing here? Rewarding the *stabs* with a PR? Should I run a box of holiday cookies by Pilosoft this AM to boot? /me slaps self) Alex: no need to stab so rude when posting, please. Rocket- .ike From carton at Ivy.NET Fri Dec 19 11:38:43 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:38:43 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] freebsd and gpt In-Reply-To: (Isaac Levy's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:14:24 -0500") References: <3cc535c80812182306v751eb956secba7794a43d9e1c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>>>> "il" == Isaac Levy writes: il> - if you are trying to install on a volume greater than 2TB il> (currently not a task for newbies, or even most users) maybe CentOS is more worried about this than freebsd because they also support LVM2 in their installer (, oh that's gotta _hurt_!), so it's quite reasonable to have a volume bigger than 2TB, while on FreeBSD geom must be used from the command line. Also CentOS have many stable filesystems for volumes that big, while in FreeBSD the stable filesystem is FFS2+softdep which still has to fsck (albeit in the background) after unclean shutdown, and fsck is O(n^2) so it might work but it's certainly not ideal on such a large volume. Anyone run a 2TB FFS+softdep volume? ZFS scrub is O(n) but ZFS is not stable. :p il> - if you have a machine with GPT already installed via Linux il> or other OS -or- - if, before committing to your platform, you want to know if the stable branch keeps up-to-date with market conditions, because you want to use it for actual work other than recompiling itself without wasting huge amounts of time on it. The huge waste of time tracking down the right versions of tiny packages and reading HOWTO's for working around unfixed problems is what drove me from Linux to BSD in the first place. It's not a newbie issue. I do agree with Ike that Linux people have always come to BSD and complain about the installer, because Linux is overfocused on installers. Isn't the CentOS installer is an X11 app?! More than half the time I don't even use the BSD installer---I boot an NFS-rooted system and use pax to install, Gentoo-style. I'd much rather have BSD's whole-system build script that delivers .tar.gz's and .iso's than Linux's X11 installer. but yeah I'm not sure gpt support in sysinst makes sense without some geom wizard like CentOS's in there as well. so long as booting is supported in the _stable_ loader, not some prerelease HEAD garbage, that doesn't increase my marginal worry for my last '-' point, but, is it really? or is the PR you filed to fix the broken loader? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zippy1981 at gmail.com Sun Dec 21 17:12:08 2008 From: zippy1981 at gmail.com (Justin Dearing) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:12:08 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Opinions on the Thinkpad W700 and soon to be released W700ds Message-ID: <5458db3c0812211412t4a13db4bt4e1deacde0902c46@mail.gmail.com> Hey, I really like the idea of a dual screen laptop, and lenovo's soon upcoming W700ds might be worth shelling out for. I'd like some opinions first though. I've been a Dell man for a long time and the last Thinkpad I owned was a monochrome 386. I'm probably going to run multiple OSes on it. I'm thinking vmware server running WindowsXP, maybe vista, ubuntu and FreeBSD or PCBSD as the main three OSes. I wanted to ask some questions since I assume a few people on this list run FreeBSD on the W700 1) Hows the wacom tablet? Has anyone used it on FreeBSD? Both as FreeBSD on baremetal or FreeBSD on vmware server? 2) Hows hibernation/dock undock support (I guess this is a general Free BSD question I've have not run freebsd on a laptop in years.) 3) Anything I should know in general about the W700 in terms of FreeBSD support? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nycbug-list at 2xlp.com Tue Dec 23 12:42:35 2008 From: nycbug-list at 2xlp.com (Jonathan Vanasco) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:42:35 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? Message-ID: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> One of my firms is about to sublease some space in Manhattan from a friend's company. We need to get our own bandwidth, which is fine. However I'd like to set up something better than just a storebought router. Right now there will just be 3-5 people running laptops via wireless. We'll likely add an NFS device. I haven't touched any of this stuff in a long time - hoping someone can offer advice/suggestions. So my options right now are: - dd-wrt or similar - soekris / alix But I haven't checked on those projects in forever. Are they still viable ? Are the setup times still 1day+ ? Thanks! From pete at nomadlogic.org Tue Dec 23 13:52:09 2008 From: pete at nomadlogic.org (pete) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:52:09 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] =?utf-8?q?router/firewall_recommendation_=3F?= In-Reply-To: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:42:35 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > One of my firms is about to sublease some space in Manhattan from a > friend's company. > > We need to get our own bandwidth, which is fine. > > However I'd like to set up something better than just a storebought > router. > > Right now there will just be 3-5 people running laptops via > wireless. We'll likely add an NFS device. > > I haven't touched any of this stuff in a long time - hoping someone > can offer advice/suggestions. > > So my options right now are: > - dd-wrt or similar > - soekris / alix > big fan of soekris + pfsense. pfsense is quite easy to install on a compact flash device (gunzip the package and output it to /dev/$cf_device). performance is acceptable for our office of ~10 people and ~30 computers. the only slowness i've seen is in accessing the webUI to monitor stuff, throughput has been excellent. it's been much better than the crappy Linksys "router" we had when i started here. -pete -- Pete Wright pete at nomadlogic.org 604.802.5059 From max at neuropunks.org Tue Dec 23 13:54:40 2008 From: max at neuropunks.org (Max Gribov) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:54:40 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> Message-ID: <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > I haven't touched any of this stuff in a long time - hoping someone > pfsense is very cool, takes about 30 mins to setup, has ability to ha-cluster, and will go on pretty much any hardware you can get some pci wireless card for the wireless part, although personally i never tried to make a wifi router out of freebsd.. cisco 800's are cool too. one cool thing about 800's is that you can use older ram (non-ddr) in them http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833120314 > can offer advice/suggestions. > > So my options right now are: > - dd-wrt or similar > - soekris / alix > > But I haven't checked on those projects in forever. Are they still > viable ? Are the setup times still 1day+ ? > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > From dcolish at gmail.com Tue Dec 23 14:13:15 2008 From: dcolish at gmail.com (Dan Colish) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:13:15 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> Message-ID: <7c21e7d30812231113k12e85d5al95e1f6f1c2863156@mail.gmail.com> Rather than run pfsense i'd recommend just straight openbsd. It will do all the same stuff, since pf is from the openbsd project, but without a web gui. I find it easier to configure and control. On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Max Gribov wrote: > Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > I haven't touched any of this stuff in a long time - hoping someone > > > pfsense is very cool, takes about 30 mins to setup, has ability to > ha-cluster, and will go on pretty much any hardware > you can get some pci wireless card for the wireless part, although > personally i never tried to make a wifi router out of freebsd.. > > cisco 800's are cool too. > one cool thing about 800's is that you can use older ram (non-ddr) in them > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833120314 > > > > can offer advice/suggestions. > > > > So my options right now are: > > - dd-wrt or similar > > - soekris / alix > > > > But I haven't checked on those projects in forever. Are they still > > viable ? Are the setup times still 1day+ ? > > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk at lists.nycbug.org > > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trish at bsdunix.net Tue Dec 23 14:39:37 2008 From: trish at bsdunix.net (Siobhan P. Lynch) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:39:37 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <7c21e7d30812231113k12e85d5al95e1f6f1c2863156@mail.gmail.com> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> <7c21e7d30812231113k12e85d5al95e1f6f1c2863156@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8C356924-0B73-4FFE-873E-4CCA8DCE5A31@bsdunix.net> If you go that direction, theres any one of the BSD's - Open and Free coming to mind, but Free, because you can use a combination of pf, ipfw, and ipf if need be to implement all kinds of wacky stuff *laugh* -Trish On Dec 23, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Dan Colish wrote: > Rather than run pfsense i'd recommend just straight openbsd. It will > do all the same stuff, since pf is from the openbsd project, but > without a web gui. I find it easier to configure and control. > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Max Gribov > wrote: > Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > I haven't touched any of this stuff in a long time - hoping someone > > > pfsense is very cool, takes about 30 mins to setup, has ability to > ha-cluster, and will go on pretty much any hardware > you can get some pci wireless card for the wireless part, although > personally i never tried to make a wifi router out of freebsd.. > > cisco 800's are cool too. > one cool thing about 800's is that you can use older ram (non-ddr) > in them > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833120314 > > > > can offer advice/suggestions. > > > > So my options right now are: > > - dd-wrt or similar > > - soekris / alix > > > > But I haven't checked on those projects in forever. Are they still > > viable ? Are the setup times still 1day+ ? > > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk at lists.nycbug.org > > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From george at ceetonetechnology.com Tue Dec 23 15:21:02 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:21:02 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] some Upcoming NYCBUG Events and BSDCons Message-ID: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> It's five years ago this month that the New York City *BSD User Group was initially organized. The list of accomplishments is great, from fund-raising to NYCBSDCon, and everyone involved has much to be proud of. We have a number of meetings lined up for 2009, but are always looking for more speakers and topics relevant to the *BSD projects. On January 7th, Larry Ludwig will be speaking on Puppet, as a follow-up to this past July's Cfengine meeting. February 4th's meeting will be Victor Duchovni on Postfix performance tuning. And on March 4th we'll have Tom Limoncelli back for a discussion on Time Management for sysadmins and developers. * * * The number of BSD-specific conferences has proliferated over the past few years, and we welcome the addition of DCBSDCon, held merely a few hours away by Chinatown bus in Washington, DC. DCBSDCon (.org) will be held February 5th and 6th at the Ward Marriott, bumping right into ShmooCon. While the CFP closed December 1, registration is now open at http://dcbsdcon.org/register.html. AsiaBSDCon (.org) will be held March 12-19 in Tokyo, Japan. Finally, BSDCan (.org), which immediately picked up the flag from the previous BSDCons back in 2004, will be held May 8th and 9th in Ottawa, Canada. Two days of technical tutorials precede the conference. Dozens of people from around New York have attended this conference over the years. Registration opens in March. Most BSD conferences will be holding BSDA exams conducted by the BSD Certification (.org) Group. For anyone looking to travel to any of these conferences, we encourage you to query the talk list for other travel companions. Carpooling or shared bus travel to DCBSDCon and BSDCan is encouraged. * * * On the last note, a big thanks to each and every participant in NYC*BUG activities. To another successful year! From riegersteve at gmail.com Tue Dec 23 15:27:26 2008 From: riegersteve at gmail.com (Steve Rieger) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:27:26 -0800 Subject: [nycbug-talk] some Upcoming NYCBUG Events and BSDCons In-Reply-To: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <495149AE.5090807@gmail.com> George Rosamond wrote: > It's five years ago this month that the New York City *BSD User Group > was initially organized. > > The list of accomplishments is great, from fund-raising to NYCBSDCon, > and everyone involved has much to be proud of. > > We have a number of meetings lined up for 2009, but are always looking > for more speakers and topics relevant to the *BSD projects. > > On January 7th, Larry Ludwig will be speaking on Puppet, as a follow-up > to this past July's Cfengine meeting. > > February 4th's meeting will be Victor Duchovni on Postfix performance > tuning. > > And on March 4th we'll have Tom Limoncelli back for a discussion on Time > Management for sysadmins and developers. > > * * * > since i am now 3500 miles away, is there any place that i can listen to a recording of the presentations ? From skreuzer at exit2shell.com Tue Dec 23 15:36:51 2008 From: skreuzer at exit2shell.com (Steven Kreuzer) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:36:51 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] some Upcoming NYCBUG Events and BSDCons In-Reply-To: <495149AE.5090807@gmail.com> References: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> <495149AE.5090807@gmail.com> Message-ID: <00589681-4753-4BB9-825C-34A9E6A06898@exit2shell.com> On Dec 23, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steve Rieger wrote: > George Rosamond wrote: >> It's five years ago this month that the New York City *BSD User Group >> was initially organized. >> >> The list of accomplishments is great, from fund-raising to NYCBSDCon, >> and everyone involved has much to be proud of. >> >> We have a number of meetings lined up for 2009, but are always >> looking >> for more speakers and topics relevant to the *BSD projects. >> >> On January 7th, Larry Ludwig will be speaking on Puppet, as a >> follow-up >> to this past July's Cfengine meeting. >> >> February 4th's meeting will be Victor Duchovni on Postfix performance >> tuning. >> >> And on March 4th we'll have Tom Limoncelli back for a discussion on >> Time >> Management for sysadmins and developers. >> >> * * * >> > since i am now 3500 miles away, is there any place that i can listen > to > a recording of the presentations ? > Yes. Nikolai Fetissov is nice enough to come out to every meeting and record them for us. http://www.fetissov.org/public/nycbug/ -- Steven Kreuzer http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer From george at ceetonetechnology.com Tue Dec 23 16:32:09 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:32:09 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <8C356924-0B73-4FFE-873E-4CCA8DCE5A31@bsdunix.net> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> <7c21e7d30812231113k12e85d5al95e1f6f1c2863156@mail.gmail.com> <8C356924-0B73-4FFE-873E-4CCA8DCE5A31@bsdunix.net> Message-ID: <495158D9.10504@ceetonetechnology.com> Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: > If you go that direction, theres any one of the BSD's - Open and Free > coming to mind, but Free, because you can use a combination of pf, ipfw, > and ipf if need be to implement all kinds of wacky stuff *laugh* > > -Trish (gman halting the top-posting) +1 on pfsense on a soekris or pcengines alix board. Simple, easy to manage, hard to break. Scalable if you need it. . . Sure, using pf (or ipf, ipfw) on a regular box on a regular full bsd makes sense in a many contexts, the reality is that for the vast majority of installs, pfsense more than sufficient. There's times we've gone each of the two different routes, and it always depends on numerous questions. But for 3-5 users, as JV stated initially, pfsense is gold. g From matt at atopia.net Tue Dec 23 16:36:31 2008 From: matt at atopia.net (matt at atopia.net) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:36:31 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? Message-ID: <309003012-1230068171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-175290729-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> I second pfSense on a soekris. Worked nicely for us when we used m0n0wall to implement a university housing network. mj ------Original Message------ From: George Rosamond Sender: talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org To: Siobhan P. Lynch Cc: NYCBUG-Talk ReplyTo: george at ceetonetechnology.com Subject: Re: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? Sent: Dec 23, 2008 16:32 Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: > If you go that direction, theres any one of the BSD's - Open and Free > coming to mind, but Free, because you can use a combination of pf, ipfw, > and ipf if need be to implement all kinds of wacky stuff *laugh* > > -Trish (gman halting the top-posting) +1 on pfsense on a soekris or pcengines alix board. Simple, easy to manage, hard to break. Scalable if you need it. . . Sure, using pf (or ipf, ipfw) on a regular box on a regular full bsd makes sense in a many contexts, the reality is that for the vast majority of installs, pfsense more than sufficient. There's times we've gone each of the two different routes, and it always depends on numerous questions. But for 3-5 users, as JV stated initially, pfsense is gold. g _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk at lists.nycbug.org http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk From spork at bway.net Tue Dec 23 17:22:47 2008 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:22:47 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <309003012-1230068171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-175290729-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <309003012-1230068171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-175290729-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, matt at atopia.net wrote: > I second pfSense on a soekris. Worked nicely for us when we used > m0n0wall to implement a university housing network. I'll third it, but on old Dell GX-110s. $99 on EBay plus a new hard drive (or flash drive or SSD drive). Quiet, low-power and a bit more oomph than the Alix stuff, plus a full install so you can fiddle around with all the packages. While it's based on pf, the learning curve here compared to even a simple pf.conf is much, much lower. C > mj > > ------Original Message------ > From: George Rosamond > Sender: talk-bounces at lists.nycbug.org > To: Siobhan P. Lynch > Cc: NYCBUG-Talk > ReplyTo: george at ceetonetechnology.com > Subject: Re: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? > Sent: Dec 23, 2008 16:32 > > Siobhan P. Lynch wrote: >> If you go that direction, theres any one of the BSD's - Open and Free >> coming to mind, but Free, because you can use a combination of pf, ipfw, >> and ipf if need be to implement all kinds of wacky stuff *laugh* >> >> -Trish > > (gman halting the top-posting) > > +1 on pfsense on a soekris or pcengines alix board. > > Simple, easy to manage, hard to break. > > Scalable if you need it. . . > > Sure, using pf (or ipf, ipfw) on a regular box on a regular full bsd > makes sense in a many contexts, the reality is that for the vast > majority of installs, pfsense more than sufficient. > > There's times we've gone each of the two different routes, and it always > depends on numerous questions. > > But for 3-5 users, as JV stated initially, pfsense is gold. > > g > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > From pete at nomadlogic.org Tue Dec 23 18:43:46 2008 From: pete at nomadlogic.org (pete) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:43:46 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] =?utf-8?q?router/firewall_recommendation_=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: <309003012-1230068171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-175290729-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: <678e19d76521dc78983614d9db27fd5d@nomadlogic.org> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:22:47 -0500 (EST), Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, matt at atopia.net wrote: > >> I second pfSense on a soekris. Worked nicely for us when we used >> m0n0wall to implement a university housing network. > > I'll third it, but on old Dell GX-110s. $99 on EBay plus a new hard drive > (or flash drive or SSD drive). Quiet, low-power and a bit more oomph than > the Alix stuff, plus a full install so you can fiddle around with all the > packages. > > While it's based on pf, the learning curve here compared to even a simple > pf.conf is much, much lower. > sheesh, try to get some work done and you miss a whole thread ;^) one thing that i was pleasantly surprised with pfsense was the built-in rrd graphing. you can turn off the webUI too if you want, but i found it quite nice to not have to setup snmp and a rrd graphing server in our small office. having said that - heck yea, {open,free,net}BSD might be the way to go if you have the time and/or interest to get everything up and running by hand. -pete -- Pete Wright pete at nomadlogic.org 604.802.5059 From nycbug at chrisbuechler.com Wed Dec 24 12:28:48 2008 From: nycbug at chrisbuechler.com (Chris Buechler) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:28:48 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <678e19d76521dc78983614d9db27fd5d@nomadlogic.org> References: <309003012-1230068171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-175290729-@bxe342.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <678e19d76521dc78983614d9db27fd5d@nomadlogic.org> Message-ID: <49527150.2010104@chrisbuechler.com> pete wrote: > sheesh, try to get some work done and you miss a whole thread ;^) > > one thing that i was pleasantly surprised with pfsense was the built-in rrd > graphing. you can turn off the webUI too if you want, but i found it quite > nice to not have to setup snmp and a rrd graphing server in our small > office. > > having said that - heck yea, {open,free,net}BSD might be the way to go if > you have the time and/or interest to get everything up and running by hand. > That's the key part - time and interest. It's not just about setting up a pf.conf. Got a PPPoE connection? You'll need to learn MPD. Want a VPN? You'll need to learn . Need server or multi-WAN load balancing? You'll need to learn relayd or slbd too. Caching DNS server? Learn your pick of software there. Want HA? Have to learn CARP, pfsync, and determine how you will sync your config between hosts. Multi-WAN? Don't forget little caveats like adding reply-to on WAN rules (and negate them as needed with rules for the WAN's subnet sans reply-to). There are a lot of little things like this, especially when you get into more complex setups like HA, multi-WAN, etc. There are numerous things that we do automatically that you don't even have to think about, much less spend significant time trying to figure out. The amount of logic in the pfsense code base that ties all these various components together to make them work seamlessly is incredible. That's the point of the project, and why even many of you here, even those who are perfectly capable of configuring all the underlying components by hand, use it. If you're starting with little knowledge of all these underlying components, and you want anything more than a simple two interface LAN and WAN NAT box with filtering, you could easily be looking at 100+ hours of effort for something you could have running with pfSense in 2 hours even starting with little to no knowledge. If you're curious and have time to burn, setting it all up yourself would be a great learning experience. But it's something most people would rather not mess with. On the contrary, if you're a guru with all these aforementioned underlying components and everyone who ever has to touch your firewall also is, then there likely isn't any reason to consider a customized GUI-fied distro like pfsense. best, Chris From bonsaime at gmail.com Wed Dec 24 23:37:02 2008 From: bonsaime at gmail.com (Jesse Callaway) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:37:02 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] some Upcoming NYCBUG Events and BSDCons In-Reply-To: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <4951482E.5070101@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, George Rosamond < george at ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > It's five years ago this month that the New York City *BSD User Group > was initially organized. > > The list of accomplishments is great, from fund-raising to NYCBSDCon, > and everyone involved has much to be proud of. > > We have a number of meetings lined up for 2009, but are always looking > for more speakers and topics relevant to the *BSD projects. > > On January 7th, Larry Ludwig will be speaking on Puppet, as a follow-up > to this past July's Cfengine meeting. > > February 4th's meeting will be Victor Duchovni on Postfix performance > tuning. > > And on March 4th we'll have Tom Limoncelli back for a discussion on Time > Management for sysadmins and developers. > > * * * > > The number of BSD-specific conferences has proliferated over the past > few years, and we welcome the addition of DCBSDCon, held merely a few > hours away by Chinatown bus in Washington, DC. > > DCBSDCon (.org) will be held February 5th and 6th at the Ward Marriott, > bumping right into ShmooCon. > > While the CFP closed December 1, registration is now open at > http://dcbsdcon.org/register.html. > > AsiaBSDCon (.org) will be held March 12-19 in Tokyo, Japan. > > Finally, BSDCan (.org), which immediately picked up the flag from the > previous BSDCons back in 2004, will be held May 8th and 9th in Ottawa, > Canada. Two days of technical tutorials precede the conference. > > Dozens of people from around New York have attended this conference over > the years. Registration opens in March. > > Most BSD conferences will be holding BSDA exams conducted by the BSD > Certification (.org) Group. > > For anyone looking to travel to any of these conferences, we encourage > you to query the talk list for other travel companions. Carpooling or > shared bus travel to DCBSDCon and BSDCan is encouraged. > > * * * > > On the last note, a big thanks to each and every participant in NYC*BUG > activities. To another successful year! > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > Wow, what a great lineup. I have to make some of these.. hopefully all of them. (jesus, i gve my parents such a shitty keyboard...) -esse -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From techneck at goldenpath.org Thu Dec 25 11:31:17 2008 From: techneck at goldenpath.org (Tim A.) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:31:17 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> Message-ID: <4953B555.4060206@goldenpath.org> Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > But I haven't checked on those projects in forever. Are they still > viable ? Are the setup times still 1day+ ? > pfSense, all the way. One thing no one's mentioned yet, though, it runs great virtualized as well. OT? Assuming you'll have some other internal services to provide, these can consolidate well on cheap or old/free hardware. A simple example, for the last year, I've run (at home, experimental) pfSense, a DC (W2k3) and Tor transparent DNS proxy (FreeBSD) all in a single VMware server (debian) on a 1GHz Pentium M with 1 GB ram. I'm using a Neo Lex Twister (Hacom) but any old machine will do. No problems at all. I'm very happy with it. From nycbug-list at 2xlp.com Fri Dec 26 11:41:17 2008 From: nycbug-list at 2xlp.com (Jonathan Vanasco) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:41:17 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] router/firewall recommendation ? In-Reply-To: <495158D9.10504@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <8BCAE704-B2E1-4CBB-B20E-0B8B815306FF@2xlp.com> <495133F0.9030101@neuropunks.org> <7c21e7d30812231113k12e85d5al95e1f6f1c2863156@mail.gmail.com> <8C356924-0B73-4FFE-873E-4CCA8DCE5A31@bsdunix.net> <495158D9.10504@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: <29CAAC0A-0368-4F93-842B-B87862C750EA@2xlp.com> On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:32 PM, George Rosamond wrote: > But for 3-5 users, as JV stated initially, pfsense is gold. Awesome. Thank you to all. I think we'll probably go for one of the pre-configured Alix boxes @ netgate ( $200, perfect! ) , slap a store bought wireless in front , and do some mac-address filtering to keep out unwantedss. I *really* don't want to be doing network admin on this, but I want to put some security in there - as we're in a shared environment. I like how i can pay them to ship me a tested/installed unit. sadly my old diy ways have started to become 'do it for me!' From greg at ltcc.com Sun Dec 28 10:31:14 2008 From: greg at ltcc.com (Greg Robinson) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:31:14 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Jails | FreeBSD | fxp0 | alias | Apache 2.2 Message-ID: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> All: Re: FreeBSD 7, PCBSD, jail, internal network i.e. 192.168.1.149, rc.conf, alias fxp0 with said IP, Apache 2.2 in jail Issue: apache serves 192.168.1.149 to browser on computer but not to outside browsers, ping to 149 works Question: Anyone know of well documented how-to on Jails? My first thought on solving this problem is the pf.conf, which I want to approach cautiously. Warmest Regards, Greg - - - - - - - - - - - Greg Robinson Lucrosol -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From george at ceetonetechnology.com Sun Dec 28 10:38:10 2008 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:38:10 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Jails | FreeBSD | fxp0 | alias | Apache 2.2 In-Reply-To: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> References: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> Message-ID: <49579D62.9080901@ceetonetechnology.com> Greg Robinson wrote: > All: > > Re: FreeBSD 7, PCBSD, jail, internal network i.e. 192.168.1.149, > rc.conf, alias fxp0 with said IP, Apache 2.2 in jail > > Issue: apache serves 192.168.1.149 to browser on computer but not to > outside browsers, ping to 149 works > > Question: Anyone know of well documented how-to on Jails? > > My first thought on solving this problem is the pf.conf, which I want to > approach cautiously. Not enough info to really take a stab at it. . . There's a decent amount out there on jails. Anything in httpd logs? Search for accf_http.ko jails apache and that might be it. . . it's loaded from the host. http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/04/23/freebsd-apache-http-accept-filter-error/ But just a complete stab. . . give us some more info. Does it work without pf? Turn it off to isolate issue . . is it apache, the jail setup or pf? George From tekronis at gmail.com Sun Dec 28 12:06:36 2008 From: tekronis at gmail.com (H. G.) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:06:36 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Jails | FreeBSD | fxp0 | alias | Apache 2.2 In-Reply-To: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> References: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> Message-ID: <60131f920812280906q4f13df0el2885feaf8e5fb0ed@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Greg Robinson wrote: > All: > > Re: FreeBSD 7, PCBSD, jail, internal network i.e. 192.168.1.149, rc.conf, > alias fxp0 with said IP, Apache 2.2 in jail > > Issue: apache serves 192.168.1.149 to browser on computer but not to > outside browsers, ping to 149 works > > Question: Anyone know of well documented how-to on Jails? > > My first thought on solving this problem is the pf.conf, which I want to > approach cautiously. > > Warmest Regards, > > Greg > > - - - - - - - - - - - > > Greg Robinson > > Lucrosol > > What I remember doing was creating a vlan interface, and a assigning a block of addresses to it as a pool for use by all the jails. Snippet from rc.conf: cloned_interfaces="vlan1" ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev rl0" ipv4_addrs_vlan1="10.0.1.10-15/27" # (Assign IPs 10.0.1.10/27 to 10.0.1.15/27) Then I created a vlan interface on the main gateway machine on the network and simply gave it an address on that network: ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 1 vlandev dc0" ipv4_addrs_vlan1="10.0.1.1/27" So now any packets destined for the jails are routed over VLAN 1. Again, thats just how I approached the problem. For what you're dealing with, you might perhaps only need to enable packet forwarding in the jail host by: Either: In rc.conf: gateway_enable="YES" or sysctl.conf: net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 Hope this helps. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mspitzer at gmail.com Sun Dec 28 15:11:16 2008 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:11:16 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Jails | FreeBSD | fxp0 | alias | Apache 2.2 In-Reply-To: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> References: <000701c96901$52d4eea0$f87ecbe0$@com> Message-ID: <8c50a3c30812281211m7c294680ped7eafd1e8851894@mail.gmail.com> well here are some thoughts: 1: check your routing, 2 or 3 times. for example your 192.168.1.149 jail has its default route pointing where? If the 192... ips are a pool that resides only on the jail box then the broadcast domain, where arp works, is local to your box. Also if the previous is working then do you have routes on your router(s) to push the traffic to the right place, traceroute is your friend here. also there may be a nat issue involved, 192.168 space is nonroutable space(rfc1918 if I rember correctly). 2: do step one again, I mostly screw up the routing my self. Use paper and pencle to draw out the network you have in your head and check against the network you have in your site. it sounds like a network issue, good luck marc On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Greg Robinson wrote: > All: > > Re: FreeBSD 7, PCBSD, jail, internal network i.e. 192.168.1.149, rc.conf, > alias fxp0 with said IP, Apache 2.2 in jail > > Issue: apache serves 192.168.1.149 to browser on computer but not to outside > browsers, ping to 149 works > > Question: Anyone know of well documented how-to on Jails? > > My first thought on solving this problem is the pf.conf, which I want to > approach cautiously. > > Warmest Regards, > > Greg > > - - - - - - - - - - - > > Greg Robinson > > Lucrosol > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. Albert Camus From nycbug-list at 2xlp.com Tue Dec 30 12:34:49 2008 From: nycbug-list at 2xlp.com (Jonathan Vanasco) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:34:49 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Happy New Year and Thank You! Message-ID: NYC-BUG: Happy new year, and a heartfelt THANK YOU for helping me out of some tough jams over the past few years! // Jonathan Vanasco w. http://findmeon.com/user/jvanasco e. jonathan at findmeon.com | Founder/CEO - FindMeOn, Inc. | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | FindMeOn.com - The cure for Multiple Web Personality Disorder | Privacy Minded Web Identity Management and 3D Social Networking | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From alex at pilosoft.com Tue Dec 30 19:37:05 2008 From: alex at pilosoft.com (alex at pilosoft.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:37:05 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Ccc anyone? Message-ID: <787222174-1230683829-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1237545621-@bxe253.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> on the off chance that anyone on-list is at ccc and wants to hang out - shoot off an email back. -alex Sent on the Now Network? from my Sprint?? BlackBerry From spork at bway.net Tue Dec 30 20:07:04 2008 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:07:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today Message-ID: Alex has some good timing. I was reading this: https://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/ It's long and complicated, and I got lost after the basic "how to make a hash" section, but this bit should pique anyone's interest: ------ The potential of this attack scenario is even greater than just obtaining a rogue certificate for a single secure website. This is because our rogue certificate doesn't have to be a website certificate, but it could be an intermediary CA certificate. Although the certificate originally signed by the real CA has in the "basic constraints" field the flag "CA = FALSE", indicating that this certificate cannot be used to validate other certificates in a certificate chain, our rogue certificate has the same flag set to "CA = TRUE". We are in possession of the private key corresponding to the public key in this rogue CA certificate. As a result we are able to issue any number of certificates to anybody we choose, and they will be recognized as valid certificates by anybody trusting the real CA, which is all Internet users using one of the common web browsers. ------ Charles From carton at Ivy.NET Tue Dec 30 21:19:27 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:19:27 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: (Charles Sprickman's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:07:04 -0500 (EST)") References: Message-ID: >>>>> "cs" == Charles Sprickman writes: cs> https://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/ ``Until Firefox 3 and IE 7, certificate revocation was disabled by default. Even in the latest versions, the browsers rely on the certificate to include a URL pointing to a revocation server.'' pwaaaahahaha! rapidssl ist gePWNen! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonsaime at gmail.com Wed Dec 31 01:01:38 2008 From: bonsaime at gmail.com (Jesse Callaway) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:01:38 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "cs" == Charles Sprickman writes: > > cs> https://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/ > > ``Until Firefox 3 and IE 7, certificate revocation was disabled by > default. Even in the latest versions, the browsers rely on the > certificate to include a URL pointing to a revocation server.'' man that sucks... so even if this issue in the paper is addressed, it won't matter until the browsers fix the revocation mechanism. > > > pwaaaahahaha! rapidssl ist gePWNen! > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > I'll have to throw in the part that really wowed me... frankly I can barely wrap my head around the POTS creation of signed certs, but maybe I'm dumb. Too many damn tiers... should rather be based on many peers, but I'll write the paper up later on this though : ) http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/: "It turned out to be possible to hide [MD5] collision blocks inside RSA moduli while even assuring the security of the pairs of moduli as being both products of sufficiently large primes. " -jesse -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dingo at 1984.ws Wed Dec 31 02:16:27 2008 From: dingo at 1984.ws (dingo) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:16:27 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:01:38 -0500, "Jesse Callaway" wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >> >>>>> "cs" == Charles Sprickman writes: >> >> cs> https://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/ >> >> ``Until Firefox 3 and IE 7, certificate revocation was disabled by >> default. Even in the latest versions, the browsers rely on the >> certificate to include a URL pointing to a revocation server.'' > > > man that sucks... so even if this issue in the paper is addressed, it > won't > matter until the browsers fix the revocation mechanism. > No. It wont matter until everyone stops pretending x509 isn't a total piece of ass created by monopolies and teclos to profit off the internet. its all horse shit. certs don't matter. Give this a read: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/x509guide.txt and the next time you see the heading "MD5 considered harmful" in relation to x509 certs and ssl, you'll say "Duh." > >> >> >> pwaaaahahaha! rapidssl ist gePWNen! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk at lists.nycbug.org >> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > > I'll have to throw in the part that really wowed me... frankly I can > barely > wrap my head around the POTS creation of signed certs, but maybe I'm dumb. > Too many damn tiers... should rather be based on many peers, but I'll > write > the paper up later on this though : ) > > http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/: > "It turned out to be possible to hide [MD5] collision blocks inside > RSA > moduli while even assuring the security of the pairs of moduli as being > both > products of sufficiently large primes. " > > -jesse From carton at Ivy.NET Wed Dec 31 02:45:46 2008 From: carton at Ivy.NET (Miles Nordin) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:45:46 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: (Jesse Callaway's message of "Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:01:38 -0500") References: Message-ID: >>>>> "jc" == Jesse Callaway writes: jc> man that sucks... so even if this issue in the paper is jc> addressed, it won't matter until the browsers fix the jc> revocation mechanism. i don't think revocation is part of the fix. The revocation problem is just funny because it adds to the feeling of powerlessness the incompetently-run CA, and makes me happy because they've been milking us all for cash all along. Their first thoughut must have been ``Rogue cert?! oh no. quick, revoke it!'' nope. PWNTx2! This attack would be foiled if the CA's would simply stop using MD5 tomorrow. They can't invalidate any fake signing certificates out there already, but there probably aren't any unless this same group made a working cert secretly. Because the collision blocks are in the keys, AIUI an attacker needs to get a new key signed to pull it off. If the CA switches to SHA from now on, someone holding an honest MD5 cert from before the switch can't use the same trick because there are no collision blocks hidden in his honest RSA key. The revocation mechanism isn't broken or underimplemented in FF3/IE7 according to the authors---rather it's badly designed in X.509, so there is no improvement to that hilarious revocpwnage planned, not even an unimplemented one. The GnuPG revocation mechanism has neither problem they mention. All revocations are signatures, but GnuPG revocations are signatures on whole keys, not on serial numbers like X.509, so you cannot manipulate me into revoking a key I don't want to by setting your serial number the same as the target. And the revokee doesn't have to consent to the mechanism by publishing a URL in their key---it is possible in GnuPG to revoke your signature on someone else's key without their consent by simply uploading it: pub 1024D/6E9400D6 2004-07-11 uid amber fechko (xi) rev DA5BFE1D 2004-12-20 Miles Nordin It's not very nice, but I think she deserved it. Amber disappeared and set her MX record for telekinetic.net to 127.0.0.1 (that is, to the domain name 127.0.0.1, in text. not the IP address 127.0.0.1. foolio.). In GnuPG signatures and revocations represent the binding or lack thereof, of key material to a uid, so when she shut down her email address clearly on purpose I decided she might like me to warn people that the binding wasn't valid any more. I guess no one else agreed with me, but I stand by my revocation. not that I have a choice---i can't unrevoke. I think it would be funny if these guys made a real CA cert with their exploit and started selling certs signed by their fake key for $2 each or something. not illegitimate certs, like, email-contact-verified certs, the regular legitimate kind, just cheaper. Why not? It's probably even legal in some jurisdiction if not in most. and most webmasters just want to turn the browser bar green. It works now, so for $2 why not? I'd buy one. If it starts turning browser bars red some day, buy a more expensive cert _some day_, not now. The whole cert thing was such a racket to begin with, i wish they'd start selling fake ones. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 304 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dcolish at gmail.com Wed Dec 31 09:40:47 2008 From: dcolish at gmail.com (Dan Colish) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:40:47 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7c21e7d30812310640y76a14e1ahb0dec363efb8f70b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "jc" == Jesse Callaway writes: > > jc> man that sucks... so even if this issue in the paper is > jc> addressed, it won't matter until the browsers fix the > jc> revocation mechanism. > > i don't think revocation is part of the fix. The revocation problem > is just funny because it adds to the feeling of powerlessness the > incompetently-run CA, and makes me happy because they've been milking > us all for cash all along. Their first thoughut must have been > ``Rogue cert?! oh no. quick, revoke it!'' nope. PWNTx2! > > This attack would be foiled if the CA's would simply stop using MD5 > tomorrow. They can't invalidate any fake signing certificates out > there already, but there probably aren't any unless this same group > made a working cert secretly. Because the collision blocks are in the > keys, AIUI an attacker needs to get a new key signed to pull it off. > If the CA switches to SHA from now on, someone holding an honest MD5 > cert from before the switch can't use the same trick because there are > no collision blocks hidden in his honest RSA key. > > The revocation mechanism isn't broken or underimplemented in FF3/IE7 > according to the authors---rather it's badly designed in X.509, so > there is no improvement to that hilarious revocpwnage planned, not > even an unimplemented one. > > The GnuPG revocation mechanism has neither problem they mention. All > revocations are signatures, but GnuPG revocations are signatures on > whole keys, not on serial numbers like X.509, so you cannot manipulate > me into revoking a key I don't want to by setting your serial number > the same as the target. And the revokee doesn't have to consent to > the mechanism by publishing a URL in their key---it is possible in > GnuPG to revoke your signature on someone else's key without their > consent by simply uploading it: > > pub 1024D/6E9400D6 2004-07-11 > uid amber fechko (xi) > rev DA5BFE1D 2004-12-20 Miles Nordin > > It's not very nice, but I think she deserved it. > > Amber disappeared and set her MX record for telekinetic.net to > 127.0.0.1 (that is, to the domain name 127.0.0.1, in text. not the IP > address 127.0.0.1. foolio.). In GnuPG signatures and revocations > represent the binding or lack thereof, of key material to a uid, so > when she shut down her email address clearly on purpose I decided she > might like me to warn people that the binding wasn't valid any more. > I guess no one else agreed with me, but I stand by my revocation. not > that I have a choice---i can't unrevoke. > > > I think it would be funny if these guys made a real CA cert with their > exploit and started selling certs signed by their fake key for $2 each > or something. not illegitimate certs, like, email-contact-verified > certs, the regular legitimate kind, just cheaper. Why not? It's > probably even legal in some jurisdiction if not in most. and most > webmasters just want to turn the browser bar green. It works now, so > for $2 why not? I'd buy one. If it starts turning browser bars red > some day, buy a more expensive cert _some day_, not now. The whole > cert thing was such a racket to begin with, i wish they'd start > selling fake ones. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > This whole issue made me curious about what root CA's I had in Firefox, remember these are hard coded in. Well it turns out that you absolutely cannot remove them from your system. Also, as it has been pointed out, a CRL for a CA that is cracked would be pointless. The only approach I see is to modify the trust given to the CA's that are know to be broken. If you check, you'll see the Firefox has not accepted certs signed by a number of MD5 CAs. So I'm not sure this is really an issue if you are careful about CA management. Also, if you read the paper, actually creating the fake Root CA can take months due to timing issues and a fairly decent computing cluster (200 ps3's). This is hardly the same level of oops as the Kandinsky DNS bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maddaemon at gmail.com Wed Dec 31 12:10:37 2008 From: maddaemon at gmail.com (maddaemon at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:10:37 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <48AC10A3-60AA-4184-A6EF-1C38B0551668@verizon.net> References: <48AC10A3-60AA-4184-A6EF-1C38B0551668@verizon.net> Message-ID: <6c1774c50812310910n6db7886bt8e9beb3c9b3921ec@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:16 PM, James E Keenan wrote: >> >> >> For example, here are 2 lines: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> where 192.168.8.17 is the Windows DC, and the other is the IIP of the >> webmail server. >> >> I need to remove the line that contains the DC _ONLY_WHEN_ there is a >> duplicate entry (same timestamp) with another IP. The text file >> contains hundreds of other entries, and there are single entries where >> the DC IP is the only entry. Using the above examples, I need to >> remove the first line and only retrieve the second line: >> >> Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 >> >> > > Perhaps this: > > #!/usr/bin/perl > use strict; > use warnings; > > my @last = ( '', '', '' ); > my @this; > my $pattern = qr/^ > ([a-zA-Z]{3}\s\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}) # date string > \s-\s > (\w+) # username > .*? > (\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}) # IP address > $/x; > > while (my $firstline = ) { > if ($firstline =~ /$pattern/) { > @last = ( $1, $2, $3 ); > last; > } > } > > while (my $l = ) { > if ($l =~ /$pattern/) { > @this = ( $1, $2, $3 ); > if ( $this[0] eq $last[0] and $this[1] eq $last[1] ) { > $last[2] = $this[2]; > } else { > print ( ( join '|' => @last ), "\n" ); > @last = @this; > } > } > } > print ( ( join '|' => @last ), "\n" ); > > __DATA__ > Dec 15 05:15:33 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.8.17 > Dec 15 05:15:56 - abc1234 tried logging in from 192.168.18.13 > Dec 15 05:16:03 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.18.43 > Dec 15 05:16:03 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.220 > Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.220 > Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.221 > Dec 15 05:16:05 - xyz1ahj tried logging in from 192.168.15.79 > Dec 15 05:16:07 - vig1234 tried logging in from 192.168.15.79 Since I don't know Perl (yet), I showed that to my boss, who then modified it, but his Perl has some rust on it, and it winds up puking a lot. Can anyone show me what should be fixed so I can get this working and off my plate? Much thanks.. Oh, and what would need to change so I could pull the data from a file rather than appending the data to the bottom of the script? I realize that this isn't the proper forum for this question, so thanks to everyone for putting up with me! #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my @last = ( '', '', '' ); my @this; my @addys; my @dcs = ('192.168.8.3', '192.168.8.17', '192.168.32.100'); my $pattern = qr/^ ([a-zA-Z]{3}\s\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}) # date string \s-\s (\w+) # username .*? (\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}) # IP address $/x; while ($line = ) { if ($firstline =~ /$pattern/) { @last = ( $1, $2); push @addys, $3; last; } } while ($line = ) { if ($line =~ /$pattern/) { @this = ( $1, $2); if ( $this[0] eq $last[0] and $this[1] eq $last[1] ) { push @addys, $3; } else { if ($addys == 1) { print "$this[0] - $this[1] tried logging in from $addys[0]\n"; } else { foreach $addy in @addys { my $flag = false; foreach $dc in @dcs { if $addy eq $dc {$flag = true;} } if !$flag { print "$this[0] - $this[1] tried logging in from $addy\n"; } } @last = @this; @addys = (); } } } foreach $addy in @addys { my $flag = false; foreach $dc in @dcs { if $addy eq $dc {$flag = true;} } if !$flag { print "$this[0] - $this[1] tried logging in from $addy\n"; } } __DATA__ Dec 30 09:34:53 user1234 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) Dec 30 09:34:53 user1234 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.7) Dec 30 14:38:37 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) Dec 30 14:38:37 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.8) Dec 30 14:38:44 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) Dec 30 14:38:44 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.8) From jkeen at verizon.net Wed Dec 31 15:09:24 2008 From: jkeen at verizon.net (James E Keenan) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:09:24 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Text parsing question In-Reply-To: <6c1774c50812310910n6db7886bt8e9beb3c9b3921ec@mail.gmail.com> References: <48AC10A3-60AA-4184-A6EF-1C38B0551668@verizon.net> <6c1774c50812310910n6db7886bt8e9beb3c9b3921ec@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1E9CAB83-CBE4-4240-885A-7578A89A62A2@verizon.net> On Dec 31, 2008, at 12:10 PM, maddaemon at gmail.com wrote: > > Since I don't know Perl (yet), I showed that to my boss, who then > modified it, Why? In what way did it not solve your problem? I ask this not out of wounded vanity, but because further diagnosis is difficult without knowing in what way my suggestion was inadequate. Note: Your original post presented very little data, so I had to make up sample data in order to illustrate an approach toward a solution. > but his Perl has some rust on it, and it winds up puking > a lot. Can anyone show me what should be fixed so I can get this > working and off my plate? As you note farther on, you are probably better off taking this question to a Perl list. I would suggest perlmonks.org. But whatever list you go to, the first feedback you get will be something like this: "You are using 'use strict;' and 'use warnings;' at the top of your program. That's good, because they show you where your code is either suboptimal or simply wrong. (perl -c yourscript) But once those statements show you your errors, it's up to you to correct them. Start with the first error reported and proceed from there." > Much thanks.. > > Oh, and what would need to change so I could pull the data from a file > rather than appending the data to the bottom of the script? perldoc -f open > I realize > that this isn't the proper forum for this question See above. > > __DATA__ > Dec 30 09:34:53 user1234 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) > Dec 30 09:34:53 user1234 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.7) > Dec 30 14:38:37 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) > Dec 30 14:38:37 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.8) > Dec 30 14:38:44 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.100) > Dec 30 14:38:44 user5678 (tried logging in from 192.168.32.8) The data you present here differs from what you originally presented and from the dummy data I made up in that there is no 'wordspace- hyphen-wordspace' between the datestamp and the username. So you would have to modify the regular expression I wrote to reflect this difference. Jim Keenan From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Dec 31 18:44:01 2008 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:44:01 -0500 Subject: [nycbug-talk] [ccc related] MD5 considered harmful today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3BFFB014-A7E7-41D0-A2C2-6E578C69C3B7@lesmuug.org> On Dec 31, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Miles Nordin wrote: > I think it would be funny if these guys made a real CA cert with their > exploit and started selling certs signed by their fake key for $2 each > or something. not illegitimate certs, like, email-contact-verified > certs, the regular legitimate kind, just cheaper. Why not? It's > probably even legal in some jurisdiction if not in most. and most > webmasters just want to turn the browser bar green. It works now, so > for $2 why not? I'd buy one. If it starts turning browser bars red > some day, buy a more expensive cert _some day_, not now. The whole > cert thing was such a racket to begin with, i wish they'd start > selling fake ones. Insanely great idea, IMHO- I mean, why not? It's like creating a new currency (backed by insecurity). -- Sidenote- everyone here who's dismissed OpenVPN, it almost goes without saying that this is yet another rock in that bucket... With that, and SSL/TLS email services, can anybody think of what other cert/pki applications or protocols are at risk? Rocket- .ike