[talk] VPN solutions

[Mark Saad]

> On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:50 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You could easily argue that a aite to site ipsec solution is industy standard and has wide support across operating sytems and "routing appliances" aka really expensive embedded computers ned cicso.
> 

Wow I was totally expecting a " I use Cassandra to map out the best route and use this awesome tool that is written in java to ...."

> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Pete Wright <pete at nomadlogic.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/02/14 14:36, Marc Spitzer wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been tasked with setting up a site to site vpn solution at work.
> >>  I was thinking about doing a openvpn on centos, we are a centos shop.
> >>  I would like to put in some freebsd boxes but I need a compelling reason.
> >>
> >> The last time I set this up I used cisco pix and that was a few years ago.
> >>
> >
> > Did a very similar setup using OpenBSD.  For me the compelling reasons
> > where the great documentation, and relative simplicity of OpenBSD's
> > IPSEC and OpenIked configuration file syntax especially when compared to
> > openswan and openVPN even.
> >
> > -pete
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pete Wright
> > pete at nomadlogic.org
> > twitter => @nomadlogicLA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at lists.nycbug.org
> > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> 
> -- 
> Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than usual.
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at lists.nycbug.org
> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Mark saad | mark.saad at yMail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.nycbug.org:8443/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140402/aaabebc0/attachment.htm>