[Tor-BSD] Tor 'run a bridge' campaign

[Shawn Webb]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:08:20AM -0500, George Rosamond wrote:
> Greetings.
> 
> For anyone not aware....
> 
> 
> https://blog.torproject.org/run-a-bridge-campaign/
> 
> Good time to get more BSD bridges up and running.

I have an interesting scenario:

I'd love to run a bridge on my home residential connection, but I have
a dynamic IPv4 address, which is discouraged for running Tor bridges.

However, I use Hurricane Electric's TunnelBroker service to gain a
static IPv6 allocation. I've set up TunnelBroker's dyndns service so
if my IPv4 address ever changes, the TunnelBroker side of things is
updated within a few seconds at most.

So, this brings the question: in this environment, would it be okay to
run an IPv6-only bridge, where there is potential for multi-second
hiccups (I've never had my IPv4 address change, though, so the risk of
hiccup is low, but still present)?

What are all your thoughts?

Thanks,

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder / Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/pubkeys/-/raw/master/Shawn_Webb/03A4CBEBB82EA5A67D9F3853FF2E67A277F8E1FA.pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/tor-bsd/attachments/20211129/897a4ec0/attachment.bin>