[nycbug-talk] WiFi use liability. . .

[George R.]

We've all had these discussions, but we all have our theories about 
having an open AP and liability. . .

Bruce Schneier refers to a law journal article. . .

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=692881

Unfortunately, it seems that, at least with my browser, that you can 
only access the abstract.

Here's a brief snip. . .

<quote>
Suppose you turn on your laptop while sitting at the kitchen table at 
home and respond OK to a prompt about accessing a nearby wireless 
Internet access point owned and operated by a neighbor. What potential 
liability may ensue from accessing someone else's wireless access 
point? How about intercepting wireless connection signals? What about 
setting up an open or unsecured wireless access point in your house or 
business? Attorneys can expect to grapple with these issues and other 
related questions as the popularity of wireless technology continues to 
increase.

This paper explores several theories of liability involving both the 
accessing and operating of wireless Internet, including the Computer 
Fraud and Abuse Act, wiretap laws, as well as trespass to chattels and 
other areas of common law. The paper concludes with a brief discussion 
of key policy considerations.
</quote>

Obviously, for a corporate network, I really can't see a logic in 
keeping an open network . . .

However, with home networks, opinion is split.

But personally, I keep my AP as locked down as possible.

Others?

g