[nycbug-talk] Another bild problem (Thunderbird 1.0.7)

pete wright nomadlogic
Tue Nov 29 16:26:48 EST 2005


On 11/29/05, Kevin Reiter <tux at penguinnetwerx.net> wrote:
> George R. wrote:
> > Kevin Reiter wrote:
> >
> >> Kevin Reiter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> Another build problem, this time with Thunderbird:
> >>>
> >>> ===>   thunderbird-1.0.7_1 depends on shared library: gtk-x11-2.0.600
> >>> - not found
> >>> ===>    Verifying install for gtk-x11-2.0.600 in
> >>> /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
> >>> ===>  gtk-2.8.8 is marked as broken: Unknown component ltverhack.
> >>> *** Error code 1
> >>>
> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20.
> >>> *** Error code 1
> >>>
> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/thunderbird.
> >>> *** Error code 1
> >>>
> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/mail/thunderbird.
> >>>
> >>> I'm seeing the same thing for bild build fails: "Unknown component
> >>> ltverhack"
> >>>
> >>> Googling for this only returned a bunch of pages on freshports.org
> >>>
> >>> Note that I _do_not_ have Gnome installed (and won't if I can avoid
> >>> it)...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Looks like the cvsup I just ran using ports-all did the trick.
> >> Thunderbird hasn't puked yet (although I had to "make deinstall | make
> >> reinstall" a few ports to get the updated versions) but sofar it's
> >> passed the point of previous failure.
> >>
> >> Looks like I'll be editing my supfile tonight to see what's been added
> >> since 5.x, since that's what seems to have caused the problem.
> >>
> >
> > Yes. . . net-im is a new one. . .
> >
> > there's really no reason for not having ports-all in your cvsup file.  I
> > mean, we're talking how many meg for /polish /portuguese, etc?
>
> I switched from using ports-all to weeding out the port trees I don't use back
> when I was on dialup (not that long ago, actually) and just never switched back.
> Since I'm on cable, I won't be so stingy anymore :)
>
>

of course, if we all used pkgsrc we could build our own packages from
source keep them in a local repo...come to think of it openbsd's ports
do this as well by default.  ok i'll take my fire proof suit off now
:)

/me tries to remember if there is a way to do this easilly w/ free's
port's collection

-p

--
~~o0OO0o~~
Pete Wright
www.nycbug.org
NYC's *BSD User Group




More information about the talk mailing list