[nycbug-talk] Git?

[Jonathan Stewart]

Peter Wright wrote:
>> Peter Wright wrote:
>>> one of my pet-peeves with SVN is the way in which data is stored on
>>> disk prevents us from using a NAS as our repository.
>> As I remember it FSFS would work just fine on a NAS and BDB has come a
>> long way as well.  Was there some specific reason it wouldn't work?
>>
> 
> quickly:
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2007-03/0067.shtml
> 
> note(1): we have some SVN hackers working here, and they readily admit
> that NAS is not suitable
> 
> note(2): yes we tried, and verified that it was suitable ;)
> 
> -pete

Okay, so it's a performance issue not a "doesn't work at all" issue.
That I can see, especially after seeing the open/close numbers in that
email.

Jonathan