[nycbug-talk] OpenBSD large filesystem experiences?

[Pete Wright]

On 15-May-09, at 8:49 PM, mark.saad at ymail.com wrote:

> I hate to say it but zfs is your only choice in the 1TB size , and  
> its freebsd or solaris on whole disks not partitions is the only  
> option .

ermm...UFS on FreeBSD supports file systems larger than 1TB.  Although  
background fsck's will take a fiscal month to complete...

thus said the manual:
The UFS2 filesystem was introduced in 2003 as a replacement to the  
original UFS and provides 64 bit counters and offsets. This allows for  
files and filesystems to grow to 2^73 bytes (2^64 * 512) in size and  
hopefully be sufficient for quite a long time. UFS2 largely solved the  
storage size limits imposed by the filesystem. Unfortunately, many  
tools and storage mechanisms still use or assume 32 bit values, often  
keeping FreeBSD limited to 2TB.


I'm not sure if obsd has merged the changes kirk et. al. made to the  
new UFS or not so ymmv.

-pete

> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Schonhorst <bschonhorst at gmail.com>
>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:08:13
> To: <talk at lists.nycbug.org>
> Subject: [nycbug-talk] OpenBSD large filesystem experiences?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at lists.nycbug.org
> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at lists.nycbug.org
> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090519/eba1264e/attachment.html>