[nycbug-talk] Sanity check on new naming scheme

[George Rosamond]

Matt Juszczak wrote:
>> Any reason you don't use functionality as part of the name?
> 
> Security by obscurity :)

Do a traceroute and look at how ISPs view that approach.

> 
>> Your naming schemse seems sane/sound.
> 
> Awesome, thanks!
>

It sooo much depends on context.

4 boxes, who cares

50 boxes, er, "location-role-<last-octet-of-ip>"

Normalize the data, then determine the names, IMHO

g