From edlinuxguru at gmail.com Fri Apr 1 22:15:09 2011 From: edlinuxguru at gmail.com (Edward Capriolo) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:15:09 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Plugging NYC-Cassandra Meetup Message-ID: Hello all, I am starting a new meet up group: http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Cassandra-User-Group/ for people interesting in the Apache Cassandra Distributed Data store http://cassandra.apache.org I also want to point out that Cassandra has special code to support FreeBSD $ grep -A5 -B1 BSD /home/edward/cassandra-dev/cassandra-0.7/conf/cassandra-env.sh ;; FreeBSD) system_memory_in_bytes=`sysctl hw.physmem | awk '{print $2}'` system_memory_in_mb=$((system_memory_in_bytes / 1024 / 1024)) system_cpu_cores=`sysctl hw.ncpu | awk '{print $2}'` break ;; :) I hope you can make it. Thank you, Edward From george at ceetonetechnology.com Mon Apr 4 10:40:52 2011 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:40:52 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] pcc 1.0 released Message-ID: <4D99D874.3030408@ceetonetechnology.com> For those who didn't catch the story: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20110403095326 g From matt at atopia.net Mon Apr 4 14:54:09 2011 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:54:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? Message-ID: Hi folks, I'm looking for a document manager that easily allows me to upload/store documents and categorize them into folders, available via a web interface. The reason I'm posting this on a FreeBSD list is that I'd like to see if there's anything good available in the ports tree, so that I don't need to manage something separately (dokuwiki, etc. I already use and that's all in the ports collection already). I guess I could always make my own port of something if need be. Does anyone use anything like this on their FreeBSD systems? I've looked into Owl and KnowledgeTree. -Matt From matt at atopia.net Mon Apr 4 15:05:16 2011 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > How about plain old Apache WebDAV?? > > As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on > desktops. I haven't worked with webDAV, other than with SVN, but it wasn't setup by me. Does Firefox support WebDAV HTTP methods or would I need to use a different client to interact with the files? -Matt From matt at atopia.net Mon Apr 4 15:33:10 2011 From: matt at atopia.net (Matt Juszczak) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Maybe a Wiki would be good? > > -- > -jesse I have a wiki, and it works well for content, but it doesn't seem fitting for a document manager. IE: the documents aren't easily searchable, and there's a lot of extra white space. From chsnyder at gmail.com Mon Apr 4 15:01:54 2011 From: chsnyder at gmail.com (Chris Snyder) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:01:54 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for a document manager that easily allows me to upload/store > documents and categorize them into folders, available via a web interface. > The reason I'm posting this on a FreeBSD list is that I'd like to see if > there's anything good available in the ports tree, so that I don't need to > manage something separately (dokuwiki, etc. I already use and that's all in > the ports collection already). I guess I could always make my own port of > something if need be. > > Does anyone use anything like this on their FreeBSD systems? I've looked > into Owl and KnowledgeTree. > > -Matt > > How about plain old Apache WebDAV? As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on desktops. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chsnyder at gmail.com Mon Apr 4 15:14:30 2011 From: chsnyder at gmail.com (Chris Snyder) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:14:30 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > How about plain old Apache WebDAV? >> >> As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on >> desktops. >> > > I haven't worked with webDAV, other than with SVN, but it wasn't setup by > me. > > Does Firefox support WebDAV HTTP methods or would I need to use a different > client to interact with the files? > > -Matt Read-only in the browser, unless you roll your own PHP uploader or something. Read-write by mounting the WebDAV folder as a network share in desktop OS. This works natively in OS X and Windows 7. It sort of works in Windows XP (they are called Web Folders). And in BSD or Linux you'd use FUSE or a WebDAV client. Works great for simple sharing. Plays especially nice with bits of OS X that like to share things via WebDAV, like iCal and iWork. It's not a "management system", so if you need features you probably want to look elsewhere. But a literal read of your requirements suggested that it would be a simple solution. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bonsaime at gmail.com Mon Apr 4 15:25:19 2011 From: bonsaime at gmail.com (Jesse Callaway) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:25:19 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: >> How about plain old Apache WebDAV? >> >> As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on >> desktops. > > I haven't worked with webDAV, other than with SVN, but it wasn't setup by > me. > > Does Firefox support WebDAV HTTP methods or would I need to use a different > client to interact with the files? > > -Matt > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > Firefox supports it... but the trick is to let the browser know that these resources (your files) are accessible via DAV verbs. I think you'll still have to let the browser know that it can read/set ACL's etc, which means writing an interface to the files you're serving up. So you could have checkboxes next to each file listed and some actions like delete/rename/copy. I don't know of any web interface so-written that does this for you. Strange... you'd think there would be one that comes to mind. There should be a fuse or otherwise available port for use to mount the DAV space as a network drive... which is the easiest way to DAV. For example, on my Mac I choose something like "Mount network drive..." and then get to setting up DAV. Same works for Windows clients without much hassle. Maybe a Wiki would be good? -- -jesse From pete at nomadlogic.org Mon Apr 4 18:28:02 2011 From: pete at nomadlogic.org (Pete Wright) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:28:02 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110404222758.GH88315@pv.nomadlogic.org> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:05:16PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > >How about plain old Apache WebDAV??? > > > >As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on > >desktops. > > I haven't worked with webDAV, other than with SVN, but it wasn't setup by > me. > > Does Firefox support WebDAV HTTP methods or would I need to use a > different client to interact with the files? > Not %100 sure about firefox supporting PUT via webdav (although I think it may actually work). I have used a decent CLI tool called cadaver that works pretty great for scripting as well as interactive sessions: http://www.webdav.org/cadaver/ -pete -- Pete Wright pete at nomadlogic.org From sjt.kar at gmail.com Tue Apr 5 07:37:00 2011 From: sjt.kar at gmail.com (Sujit K M) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:07:00 +0530 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: <20110404222758.GH88315@pv.nomadlogic.org> References: <20110404222758.GH88315@pv.nomadlogic.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Pete Wright wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:05:16PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: >> >How about plain old Apache WebDAV??? >> > >> >As a plus, you can mount the managed folders as OS-level filesystems on >> >desktops. >> >> I haven't worked with webDAV, other than with SVN, but it wasn't setup by >> me. >> >> Does Firefox support WebDAV HTTP methods or would I need to use a >> different client to interact with the files? >> > > Not %100 sure about firefox supporting PUT via webdav (although I think > it may actually work). ?I have used a decent CLI tool called cadaver > that works pretty great for scripting as well as interactive sessions: How about OpenCMS? This has some internal support for webdav, I think. > > http://www.webdav.org/cadaver/ > > -pete > > > -- > Pete Wright > pete at nomadlogic.org > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- -- Sujit K M blog(http://kmsujit.blogspot.com/) From sjt.kar at gmail.com Tue Apr 5 07:43:24 2011 From: sjt.kar at gmail.com (Sujit K M) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:13:24 +0530 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: <20110404222758.GH88315@pv.nomadlogic.org> Message-ID: > How about OpenCMS? This has some internal support for webdav, I think. http://opencms-wiki.org/WebDAV_access_to_the_OpenCms_VFS From mspitzer at gmail.com Tue Apr 5 21:11:44 2011 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:11:44 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: git? On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for a document manager that easily allows me to upload/store > documents and categorize them into folders, available via a web interface. > The reason I'm posting this on a FreeBSD list is that I'd like to see if > there's anything good available in the ports tree, so that I don't need to > manage something separately (dokuwiki, etc. I already use and that's all in > the ports collection already). ?I guess I could always make my own port of > something if need be. > > Does anyone use anything like this on their FreeBSD systems? ?I've looked > into Owl and KnowledgeTree. > > -Matt > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. --Albert Camus ?The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. --Margaret Thatcher From sjt.kar at gmail.com Wed Apr 6 03:15:48 2011 From: sjt.kar at gmail.com (Sujit K M) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:45:48 +0530 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Sujit K M wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Marc Spitzer wrote: >> git? > donot understand what you are saying? If you are saying there is > content management > system on top of GIT it is fairly possible. > -- -- Sujit K M blog(http://kmsujit.blogspot.com/) From mspitzer at gmail.com Wed Apr 6 08:20:42 2011 From: mspitzer at gmail.com (Marc Spitzer) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:20:42 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Document Manager as part of Ports Tree? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for a document manager that easily allows me to upload/store > documents and categorize them into folders, available via a web interface. > The reason I'm posting this on a FreeBSD list is that I'd like to see if > there's anything good available in the ports tree, so that I don't need to > manage something separately (dokuwiki, etc. I already use and that's all in > the ports collection already). ?I guess I could always make my own port of > something if need be. > > Does anyone use anything like this on their FreeBSD systems? ?I've looked > into Owl and KnowledgeTree. I don't know if this is any good or not, came up in a google search for something related: http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Main_Page Alfresco offers true Open Source Enterprise Content Management (ECM) - Document Management, Collaboration, Records Management, Knowledge Management, Web Content Management and Imaging. * Document Management * Web Content Management * Records Management * Image Management * Content Repository Alfresco uses best-of-breed Open Source technologies such as Spring, Hibernate, Lucene, modern standards such as JSR-168, JSR-170, Web Services, Java Server Faces and contributions from the open source community to get higher quality software produced more quickly at much lower cost. Alfresco is built by a team with 15 years experience in this space, including the co-founder of Documentum, VP of Web Content Management of Interwoven, and other senior industry players. Alfresco allows users to access a simple to use, Intelligent Virtual File System from their native application or portal with the full power of an Enterprise Content Management System. Retrieved from "http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Project_Overview" -- Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better. --Albert Camus ?The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. --Margaret Thatcher From nikolai at fetissov.org Mon Apr 11 22:27:49 2011 From: nikolai at fetissov.org (Nikolai Fetissov) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:27:49 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] April 2011 meeting audio Message-ID: Folks, Recording of the presentation is online at http://www.fetissov.org/public/nycbug/nycbug-04-06-11.mp3 Quality is not the greatest, but that's the best I could do. Sorry for the delay. Cheers, -- Nikolai From bonsaime at gmail.com Tue Apr 12 13:12:28 2011 From: bonsaime at gmail.com (Jesse Callaway) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:12:28 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] process/command listening to a socket Message-ID: I've been linuxized for a while by the demands of... well everyone runs Centos : ( Anwyay, I'm not sure how to do some things in BSD anymore. In particular, I forget how to show the processes which have listening sockets. With gnu netstat I do this to show programs with listening tcp's - netstat -ntlp It's understood that -p is certainly not going to behave the same in both environments. Would lsof be a better approach in BSD? -- -jesse From akosela at andykosela.com Tue Apr 12 15:11:47 2011 From: akosela at andykosela.com (Andy Kosela) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:11:47 +0200 Subject: [nycbug-talk] process/command listening to a socket In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Jesse Callaway wrote: > I've been linuxized for a while by the demands of... well everyone > runs Centos : ( > > Anwyay, I'm not sure how to do some things in BSD anymore. In > particular, I forget how to show the processes which have listening > sockets. With gnu netstat I do this to show programs with listening > tcp's - > > > netstat -ntlp > > > It's understood that -p is certainly not going to behave the same in > both environments. Would lsof be a better approach in BSD? # netstat -anfinet or # sockstat -4l would serve you good in BSD environment. Generally I find BSD netstat(1) less cluttered than GNU one. --Andy From spork at bway.net Fri Apr 15 05:25:00 2011 From: spork at bway.net (Charles Sprickman) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:25:00 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] FreeBSD IPv6 resources (native, not tunnel)? Message-ID: <4DA80EEC.4020404@bway.net> Hi all, Anyone aware of a good place to talk about IPv6 on FreeBSD? At home I have a tunnel setup (pfsense w/ipv6 branch - awesome) and everything is just "automagic" with LAN IPs and such. But at work (not Bway, FWIW), we just got our /48 dumped on the LAN and it's proving to be a bit more complex than the home setup. Can't see a simple way to get the kernel to create a link-local address without a reboot, the rc.d stuff is really bizarre compared to ipv4, and well, I just discovered ndp and am troubleshooting why my connectivity comes and goes. I suspect it has to do with the link-local address not existing. Lots of little challenges with this stuff, and Google sort of proves that there are not a lot of people doing non-tunnel ipv6. Just figuring out how to get tcpdump to see v6 was a bit annoying. And a free tip on removing static IPv6 from an interface... You might thing "ifconfig fxp0 delete inet6 2001:518:b33f::2" would do it, but no. That works on ipv4, but for ipv6 we're talking something more like this: "ifconfig fxp0 inet6 2001:518:b33f::2 delete" Apparently that's always been the "correct" way, but ifconfig's parser doesn't enforce putting the modifier at the end with IPv4. There are many small fun things like this. Charles ps - serious, this isn't just Ike-bait. :) From george at ceetonetechnology.com Wed Apr 27 11:44:59 2011 From: george at ceetonetechnology.com (George Rosamond) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:44:59 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Anyone read Daemon? Message-ID: <4DB839FB.5000408@ceetonetechnology.com> Nice tool. Who needs clusters and clouds when you have a botnet? http://www.secureworks.com/research/threats/coreflood/?threat=coreflood If anyone hasn't read Daemon by Daniel Suarez, highly recommended. (thanks PM) g From robin.polak at gmail.com Wed Apr 27 17:54:59 2011 From: robin.polak at gmail.com (Robin Polak) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:54:59 -0400 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Anyone read Daemon? In-Reply-To: <4DB839FB.5000408@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <4DB839FB.5000408@ceetonetechnology.com> Message-ID: I totally agree with the book recommendation. I just finished the book. I will have to check out that link. :) On Apr 27, 2011 11:51 AM, "George Rosamond" wrote: > Nice tool. Who needs clusters and clouds when you have a botnet? > > http://www.secureworks.com/research/threats/coreflood/?threat=coreflood > > If anyone hasn't read Daemon by Daniel Suarez, highly recommended. > > (thanks PM) > > g > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk at lists.nycbug.org > http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From drulavigne at sympatico.ca Thu Apr 28 09:42:00 2011 From: drulavigne at sympatico.ca (Dru Lavigne) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:42:00 +0000 Subject: [nycbug-talk] Submit Your Real World pf.conf Message-ID: As some of you may know, fwbuilder.org is a cross-platform, graphical firewall management utility that supports iptables, ASA, PIX, FWSM, Cisco router access lists, pf, ipfw, ipfilter, and HP ProCurve ACL firewalls. Vadim Kurland and Mike Horn, the lead fwbuilder developers, have begun work on providing complete pf.conf import functionality, the last piece that was missing to provide 100% pf support. This work is a direct result of several customers expressing interest in the addition of pf configuration import and they expect the work to be completed by this summer. In order for them to be confident that as many permutations as possible are covered, they are looking for BSD users who can share their real world pf.conf files. The configs need to contain valid IP addresses, but users can sanitize the configs by globally replacing "real" IP addresses with "fake" IP addresses. Users who are concerned about privacy can encrypt their file with Vadim's public PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B08DC58. You can send your pf.conf file(s) to configs at netcitadel dot com. They will also be looking for testers as the work nears completion. Please help spread the word through social media and by posting to other mailing lists that may be interested. Cheers, Dru -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: