[nycbug-talk] Any web stat program that collects data on time to serve

[Jesse Callaway]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jesse Callaway <bonsaime at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Chris Snyder <chsnyder at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Chris Snyder <chsnyder at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > As you've discovered, Apache doesn't log the request separate from the
>>> > response, so a log analyzer is no help here.
>>>
>>> But wait -- this isn't strictly true. Apache can be made to log the
>>> time taken to serve the request, in microseconds. It just doesn't do
>>> so in the standard log format.
>>>
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_log_config.html#formats
>>>
>>> But getting awstats or another log analyzer to pay attention is another
>>> story.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at lists.nycbug.org
>>> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>>
>> correctamundo...
>>
>> Gotta go with sec (simple event correlator) or collectd for the easiest
>> way. Otherwise you're writing your own filter program for the apache logs...
>> which i mean it's kinda cool that you can just add a pipe character to the
>> logfile name, like in perl. But...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -jesse
>>
>
> To be clear I am using:
>      LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\"
> \"%{User-agent}i\" %T %D" with_time
>         CustomLog     /opt/awstats-7.0/wwwroot/cgi-bin/gui-access-perf.log
> with_time
>
> %D is the time in microseconds.
>
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_log_config.html#formats
>
> I know I can script something and make my own report, but I really do not
> want to. If find when you write these things yourself you end up taking care
> of them indefinitely. I was hoping to find some tool that would break down
> %D by page. hits/average(time to serve),max(time_to_serve),95th
> percentile(time_to_serve).
>
>
Could you commit to the apache snmp module? Then you might possibly be able
to pawn off maintenance at some point. Er... nah, that wouldn't really work
per-page. Just thinking out loud.

-- 
-jesse
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.nycbug.org:8443/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110802/a1459aa7/attachment.htm>