[talk] Python

[Edward Capriolo]

if (running default options)
    try concurrentMarkSweep | G1

if (still having problems)
  application not good fit for auto gc | buy more servers

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Pete Wright <pete at nomadlogic.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 04/17/2016 07:13 AM, George Rosamond wrote:
>
>> On 04/17/16 09:30, Sujit K M wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found python projects to be very good from an code review perspective.
>>> What I found is Python Language makes it simple to without an IDE simpler
>>> code to review. I find Java Projects to be the most difficult to do code
>>> review.
>>>
>>> What is the general view on this? Or is it one of my hallucinations?
>>>
>>
>> My completely unscientific broad view is that most people around the
>> NYC*BUG scene will have a preference for either Python or Perl in that
>> particular layer of languages, with heavy doses of shell, C, etc.
>>
>> Personally, I'd rather have to read the phone book in Python or Perl
>> than read one 15-line xterm page of Java.
>>
>>
> heh - so i think my new job title is going to officially become Java JRE
> garbage collection wizard...or something like that.  there are some really
> really neat things about java in terms of analysis of the JVM - but i'll be
> damned if i can ever *really* grok wtf is up with GC on java :)
>
> -pete
>
>
> --
> Pete Wright
> pete at nomadlogic.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at lists.nycbug.org
> http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.nycbug.org:8443/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160419/7d335414/attachment.htm>