<p>No, but they weren't too tight lipped. They mentioned that phys disk health was measured entirely throuh SMART.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 25, 2011 1:37 AM, "Eitan Adler" <<a href="mailto:lists@eitanadler.com">lists@eitanadler.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">>>><br>>>> This is cool:<br>
> <br>> Yes,  but...<br>> <br>>>> <a href="http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/">http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/</a><br>
>>><br>>>> and they give parts lists to build your own.<br>> <br>> But not the software. Managing 135TB of storage space (and monitoring<br>> it) is a non-trivial problem.<br>> <br>>> Going down to 2tb drives/90 , which are dirt cheap, it comes to just over $5k.<br>
> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> Eitan Adler<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> talk mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:talk@lists.nycbug.org">talk@lists.nycbug.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk">http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div>