[talk] virtualization support in openbsd

[Justin Sherrill]

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Pete Wright <pete at nomadlogic.org> wrote:
> hah - i wish you were correct re: linux vitrualization being consistent.
>  libvirt is *sorta* consistent if you stick to one distro - but once you
> start mixing centos, unbuntu and debian hypervisors proceed at your own
> risk.  and Qemu/KVM also has interesting delta's between distro's and
> kernel revisions I have found.

Yes, but!  It's the same thing between distros.  It's not libvirtng on
one and libvirthyve on another and rcvirt on another, none of which
work in the same way.  Differences in tooling is not the same as
inconsistency in implementation.  I realize my blanket complaint can
be picked at in different ways; my frustration comes from the circles
always being drawn between BSDs.