[Tor-BSD] Tor 0.2.4.19

nanotek nanotek at bsdbox.co
Sat Dec 21 19:26:32 EST 2013


On 22/12/2013 11:15 AM, George Rosamond wrote:
> Linus Nordberg:
>> Carlo Strub <cs at FreeBSD.org> wrote
>> Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:57:16 +0100:
>>
>> | It is therefore typically best to try yourself to update the port by
>> | changing the respective files, and then send the patch to the
>> | maintainer via a Bug report. If you need help, please consult the
>>
>> FWIW, this particular update -- from 0.2.4.18-rc to 0.2.4.19 -- is
>> probably a good one to pick for someone who wants do their first ports
>> update. There are no changes to the program, its config files or
>> documentation. The only changes are to the ChangeLog and ReleaseNotes
>> documents and version numbers (configure.ac and two more for Windows
>> builds).
>
> Yup... and the very first step in doing your own updates is looking at
> the ChangeLog, nanotek :)
>
> Just go back to the instructions I posted earlier.
>
> Also, I'm a bit curious why we're talking about 0.2.4.19 from .18 which
> is now marked "stable" for Tor, instead of moving to 0.2.5.1-alpha,
> which should now be tor-devel. . .
>
> I moved (most) of my relays/bridges to 0.2.5.1, since I've been sticking
> to tor-devel
>
> I assume the various BSD port/pkg systems should reflect that...
>
> port maintainers?  Linus?
>
> g
>
> _______________________________________________
> A list focused on porting and running Tor software on *BSD Unix
> Tor-BSD mailing list
> Tor-BSD at nycbug.org
> http://www.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/tor-bsd
>

I was just reading in the Tor Weekly News post that .19 is virtually the 
same as .18. Do I use the same instructions you gave me to update the 
port to 0.2.5.1-alpha?

-- 
syn.bsdbox.co



More information about the Tor-BSD mailing list