[Tor-BSD] Tor 0.2.4.19

[George Rosamond]

nanotek:
> On 22/12/2013 11:15 AM, George Rosamond wrote:
>> Linus Nordberg:
>>> Carlo Strub <cs at FreeBSD.org> wrote
>>> Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:57:16 +0100:
>>>
>>> | It is therefore typically best to try yourself to update the port by
>>> | changing the respective files, and then send the patch to the
>>> | maintainer via a Bug report. If you need help, please consult the
>>>
>>> FWIW, this particular update -- from 0.2.4.18-rc to 0.2.4.19 -- is
>>> probably a good one to pick for someone who wants do their first ports
>>> update. There are no changes to the program, its config files or
>>> documentation. The only changes are to the ChangeLog and ReleaseNotes
>>> documents and version numbers (configure.ac and two more for Windows
>>> builds).
>>
>> Yup... and the very first step in doing your own updates is looking at
>> the ChangeLog, nanotek :)
>>
>> Just go back to the instructions I posted earlier.
>>
>> Also, I'm a bit curious why we're talking about 0.2.4.19 from .18 which
>> is now marked "stable" for Tor, instead of moving to 0.2.5.1-alpha,
>> which should now be tor-devel. . .
>>
>> I moved (most) of my relays/bridges to 0.2.5.1, since I've been sticking
>> to tor-devel
>>
>> I assume the various BSD port/pkg systems should reflect that...
>>
>> port maintainers?  Linus?
>>
>> g
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> A list focused on porting and running Tor software on *BSD Unix
>> Tor-BSD mailing list
>> Tor-BSD at nycbug.org
>> http://www.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/tor-bsd
>>
> 
> I was just reading in the Tor Weekly News post that .19 is virtually the
> same as .18. Do I use the same instructions you gave me to update the
> port to 0.2.5.1-alpha?
> 

Why don't you just try .19 first and see how that goes.

I have to recheck, but I don't think anything was different for 0.2.5.1,
the new alpha.

g